Compare
Oaks vs Whitemore
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.0 km apart · Oaks profile · Whitemore profile
Oaks Whitemore
Whitemore and Oaks are neighbouring areas in Tasmania with very different populations. Whitemore is a younger community where 21.8% of people are children, while Oaks has no children and a typical resident is far older at 58. Typical weekly family incomes are also far higher in Whitemore at $1,854 compared to $1,125 in Oaks. Whitemore has a more present workforce, with 10.3% of people earning over $2,000 a week, whereas no one in Oaks earns that amount.
Both areas share a total lack of nearby public transport and walk-to services, and neither has any Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander residents. They also have very similar rates of people providing unpaid care. While they are alike in their isolation, the gaps between them are stark; for example, the typical monthly home-loan payment is far higher in Oaks at $3,337, compared to $1,083 in Whitemore.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 36
- First area, 2021: 24
- Second area, 2011: 236
- Second area, 2016: 198
- Second area, 2021: 197
- First area, 2016: 52 yrs
- First area, 2021: 58 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Whitemore: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Whitemore: 1.5% males, 2.5% females
- 75–79 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Whitemore: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Whitemore: 5.0% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Whitemore: 6.5% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Oaks: 57.1% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Whitemore: 4.5% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 42.9% females; 55–59 in Whitemore: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 50–54 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Whitemore: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 45–49 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Whitemore: 4.5% males, 1.5% females
- 40–44 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Whitemore: 4.5% males, 4.5% females
- 35–39 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Whitemore: 1.5% males, 5.5% females
- 30–34 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Whitemore: 3.5% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Whitemore: 1.5% males, 4.5% females
- 20–24 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Whitemore: 2.0% males, 4.5% females
- 15–19 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Whitemore: 0.0% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Whitemore: 4.5% males, 4.5% females
- 5–9 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Whitemore: 1.5% males, 2.0% females
- 0–4 in Oaks: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Whitemore: 4.0% males, 5.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $612
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2011: $495
- Second area, 2016: $564
- Second area, 2021: $753
- First area, 2016: $2,062
- First area, 2021: $1,187
- Second area, 2011: $1,199
- Second area, 2016: $1,458
- Second area, 2021: $1,687
- First area, 2016: $2,083
- First area, 2021: $1,125
- Second area, 2011: $1,261
- Second area, 2016: $1,562
- Second area, 2021: $1,854
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $130
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $130
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2021: $3,337
- Second area, 2011: $1,400
- Second area, 2016: $1,232
- Second area, 2021: $1,083
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Oaks with nearby areas
Compare Whitemore with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Oaks vs Whitemore [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60472/oaks/vs/SAL60753/whitemore