Compare
Mount Rumney vs Rokeby
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 5.0 km apart · Mount Rumney profile · Rokeby profile
Mount Rumney Rokeby
Rokeby (Tas.) and Mount Rumney are neighbouring areas with very different characters. Rokeby (Tas.) is a younger place where the typical resident is 32, while those in Mount Rumney are far older at 44. This age gap is reflected in the homes; Rokeby (Tas.) has far more renters (37.9%) and a higher share of one-parent families (28.2%). In contrast, Mount Rumney is wealthier and more established, with a typical weekly household income of $2,262 compared to $1,279 in Rokeby (Tas.), and far more people owning their homes outright (48.6% versus 20%).
Both areas share a similar level of school advantage and a nearly identical number of people per bedroom. However, their daily experience of the landscape differs. Rokeby (Tas.) is somewhat walkable with many residents living within a short walk of public transport and shops. Mount Rumney is car-dependent, with no public transport stops and a typical walk to the nearest stop taking 29 minutes. This contrast is highlighted by the fact that 80.5% of homes in Rokeby (Tas.) have a 15-minute-city walkshed, while that figure is 0.0% in Mount Rumney.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 442
- First area, 2016: 267
- First area, 2021: 303
- Second area, 2011: 3,157
- Second area, 2016: 3,375
- Second area, 2021: 4,211
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 50 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Rumney: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Rokeby: 0.3% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Mount Rumney: 1.4% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Rokeby: 0.4% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Mount Rumney: 3.4% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Rokeby: 0.7% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Mount Rumney: 1.4% males, 4.5% females; 70–74 in Rokeby: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Mount Rumney: 5.2% males, 5.2% females; 65–69 in Rokeby: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Mount Rumney: 3.8% males, 4.5% females; 60–64 in Rokeby: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Mount Rumney: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Rokeby: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Mount Rumney: 4.8% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Rokeby: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 45–49 in Mount Rumney: 2.4% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Rokeby: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Mount Rumney: 0.0% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Rokeby: 2.3% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Mount Rumney: 4.5% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Rokeby: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Mount Rumney: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Rokeby: 4.9% males, 5.6% females
- 25–29 in Mount Rumney: 3.8% males, 2.1% females; 25–29 in Rokeby: 5.5% males, 5.8% females
- 20–24 in Mount Rumney: 1.0% males, 1.7% females; 20–24 in Rokeby: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 15–19 in Mount Rumney: 5.2% males, 1.7% females; 15–19 in Rokeby: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Mount Rumney: 4.5% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Rokeby: 3.9% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Mount Rumney: 4.5% males, 1.7% females; 5–9 in Rokeby: 3.6% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Mount Rumney: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 0–4 in Rokeby: 3.3% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $722
- First area, 2016: $779
- First area, 2021: $1,049
- Second area, 2011: $437
- Second area, 2016: $505
- Second area, 2021: $719
- First area, 2011: $1,838
- First area, 2016: $1,786
- First area, 2021: $2,262
- Second area, 2011: $830
- Second area, 2016: $888
- Second area, 2021: $1,279
- First area, 2011: $1,942
- First area, 2016: $1,981
- First area, 2021: $2,363
- Second area, 2011: $966
- Second area, 2016: $1,080
- Second area, 2021: $1,513
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $277
- First area, 2021: $268
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $240
- Second area, 2021: $330
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $1,100
- Second area, 2016: $1,100
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Rumney with nearby areas
Compare Rokeby with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Rumney vs Rokeby [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60432/mount-rumney/vs/SAL60564/rokeby