Compare
Montana vs Red Hills
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.5 km apart · Montana profile · Red Hills profile
Montana Red Hills
Red Hills and Montana are neighbouring rural areas in Tasmania, both with small populations. Red Hills has a larger share of seniors, at 16.1% compared to 0% in Montana, and more adults with a bachelor degree or higher (22.9% versus 12.5%). Red Hills is better served by transport, with 32.26 public transport stops per 1,000 people and a 4-minute walk to the nearest stop, while Montana has no stops and a walk of 89 minutes. Typical weekly income is also well higher in Red Hills, at $900 compared to $669 in Montana.
Everyday life shares many similarities across both places, including nearly identical shares of children under 15 and people doing unpaid housework. Both areas have similar typical weekly rents, around $250 to $265, and neither area has any residents who commute by public transport. While the two areas remain alike in these respects, the gap in typical age has grown, with residents now noticeably older in Montana.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 56
- First area, 2021: 57
- Second area, 2016: 120
- Second area, 2021: 124
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Red Hills: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Red Hills: 0.0% males, 4.0% females
- 75–79 in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Red Hills: 0.0% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Red Hills: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Red Hills: 2.4% males, 5.6% females
- 60–64 in Montana: 0.0% males, 9.5% females; 60–64 in Red Hills: 0.0% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Montana: 11.9% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Red Hills: 5.6% males, 4.8% females
- 50–54 in Montana: 7.1% males, 14.3% females; 50–54 in Red Hills: 6.3% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Red Hills: 4.0% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Montana: 0.0% males, 7.1% females; 40–44 in Red Hills: 3.2% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Red Hills: 2.4% males, 7.1% females
- 30–34 in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Red Hills: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Red Hills: 3.2% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Montana: 9.5% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Red Hills: 2.4% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Montana: 9.5% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Red Hills: 4.8% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Montana: 11.9% males, 7.1% females; 10–14 in Red Hills: 5.6% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Montana: 11.9% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Red Hills: 3.2% males, 2.4% females
- 0–4 in Montana: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Red Hills: 4.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $437
- First area, 2021: $669
- Second area, 2016: $507
- Second area, 2021: $900
- First area, 2016: $1,041
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2016: $1,145
- Second area, 2021: $1,781
- First area, 2016: $1,125
- First area, 2021: $1,937
- Second area, 2016: $1,297
- Second area, 2021: $1,593
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $265
- Second area, 2016: $83
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2016: $860
- First area, 2021: $1,214
- Second area, 2016: $1,142
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Montana with nearby areas
Compare Red Hills with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Montana vs Red Hills [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60414/montana/vs/SAL60540/red-hills