Compare
Lanena vs Rosevears
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.5 km apart · Lanena profile · Rosevears profile
Lanena Rosevears
Rosevears and Lanena are neighbouring Tasmanian areas with similar population sizes, but they differ significantly in accessibility and demographics. Rosevears is more isolated for pedestrians, with a 41-minute walk to the nearest stop compared to just 6 minutes in Lanena. Lanena is more walkable overall, with 71.6% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park, while Rosevears has 38.4%. There is also a stark contrast among First Nations residents; the typical age is far younger in Rosevears at 14 years, whereas in Lanena it is 48 years.
Daily life is quite similar in both places, with nearly identical typical weekly household incomes and a shared level of school advantage. Both areas also have about the same proportion of people born overseas and a similar number of children under 15. While they share these commonalities, some gaps are shifting, such as the unemployment rate, which is now well higher in Lanena at 7.5% compared to 1.9% in Rosevears.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 313
- First area, 2016: 320
- First area, 2021: 343
- Second area, 2011: 304
- Second area, 2016: 352
- Second area, 2021: 365
- First area, 2011: 52 yrs
- First area, 2016: 55 yrs
- First area, 2021: 57 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 55 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 56 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lanena: 0.0% males, 1.7% females; 85+ in Rosevears: 1.9% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Lanena: 1.4% males, 2.8% females; 80–84 in Rosevears: 0.8% males, 3.0% females
- 75–79 in Lanena: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 75–79 in Rosevears: 3.2% males, 2.7% females
- 70–74 in Lanena: 1.9% males, 5.0% females; 70–74 in Rosevears: 4.8% males, 5.9% females
- 65–69 in Lanena: 5.8% males, 5.5% females; 65–69 in Rosevears: 5.9% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Lanena: 4.4% males, 7.5% females; 60–64 in Rosevears: 5.9% males, 6.7% females
- 55–59 in Lanena: 5.0% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Rosevears: 4.6% males, 5.6% females
- 50–54 in Lanena: 3.9% males, 5.3% females; 50–54 in Rosevears: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Lanena: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 45–49 in Rosevears: 1.3% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Lanena: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 40–44 in Rosevears: 2.7% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Lanena: 0.8% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Rosevears: 0.0% males, 1.1% females
- 30–34 in Lanena: 1.7% males, 0.8% females; 30–34 in Rosevears: 1.6% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Lanena: 0.0% males, 1.9% females; 25–29 in Rosevears: 2.4% males, 1.9% females
- 20–24 in Lanena: 2.2% males, 0.8% females; 20–24 in Rosevears: 2.7% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Lanena: 1.9% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Rosevears: 1.3% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Lanena: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Rosevears: 3.5% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Lanena: 2.8% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Rosevears: 0.8% males, 1.9% females
- 0–4 in Lanena: 0.8% males, 1.1% females; 0–4 in Rosevears: 1.9% males, 0.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $450
- First area, 2016: $564
- First area, 2021: $605
- Second area, 2011: $461
- Second area, 2016: $536
- Second area, 2021: $641
- First area, 2011: $928
- First area, 2016: $1,158
- First area, 2021: $1,339
- Second area, 2011: $1,045
- Second area, 2016: $1,298
- Second area, 2021: $1,444
- First area, 2011: $1,385
- First area, 2016: $1,424
- First area, 2021: $1,463
- Second area, 2011: $1,221
- Second area, 2016: $1,394
- Second area, 2021: $1,652
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $240
- First area, 2016: $284
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $284
- Second area, 2016: $265
- Second area, 2021: $305
- First area, 2011: $1,607
- First area, 2016: $1,616
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,630
- Second area, 2021: $1,473
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Lanena with nearby areas
Compare Rosevears with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lanena vs Rosevears [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60318/lanena/vs/SAL60572/rosevears