Compare
Karanja vs National Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Karanja profile · National Park profile
Karanja National Park
National Park and Karanja are both sparsely populated areas in Tasmania. National Park has a much younger and more diverse age range, with children under 15 making up 27.5% of the population and seniors accounting for 23.8%. In contrast, Karanja has no children or seniors. This difference extends to income and health; the typical weekly household income in Karanja is far higher at $2,050 compared to $725 in National Park, while National Park has a much higher share of people with long-term health conditions (38.8%) and those needing daily help (15.0%).
Both areas share a complete absence of residents who speak a language other than English at home and no one is currently unemployed. They also both lack homes within a 15-minute walk of schools, groceries, or health services. While National Park is more remote with a much longer drive time to the city, both remain very small residential pockets within the same region.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 28
- First area, 2021: 31
- Second area, 2011: 135
- Second area, 2016: 73
- Second area, 2021: 80
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in National Park: 3.9% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in National Park: 5.2% males, 6.5% females
- 65–69 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in National Park: 3.9% males, 5.2% females
- 60–64 in Karanja: 12.5% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in National Park: 11.7% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Karanja: 16.7% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in National Park: 0.0% males, 9.1% females
- 50–54 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 12.5% females; 50–54 in National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Karanja: 25.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in National Park: 5.2% males, 5.2% females
- 40–44 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in National Park: 6.5% males, 9.1% females
- 35–39 in Karanja: 16.7% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in National Park: 0.0% males, 6.5% females
- 30–34 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in National Park: 6.5% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Karanja: 16.7% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in National Park: 0.0% males, 9.1% females
- 5–9 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Karanja: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in National Park: 6.5% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $589
- First area, 2021: $687
- Second area, 2011: $314
- Second area, 2016: $479
- Second area, 2021: $522
- First area, 2016: $1,125
- First area, 2021: $2,050
- Second area, 2011: $544
- Second area, 2016: $1,062
- Second area, 2021: $725
- First area, 2016: $1,187
- First area, 2021: $1,875
- Second area, 2011: $739
- Second area, 2016: $1,187
- Second area, 2021: $1,187
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $50
- Second area, 2011: $28
- Second area, 2021: $353
- First area, 2021: $800
- Second area, 2011: $1,213
- Second area, 2016: $730
- Second area, 2021: $1,083
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Karanja with nearby areas
Compare National Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Karanja vs National Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60296/karanja/vs/SAL60445/national-park