Compare
Emita vs Whitemark
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Emita profile · Whitemark profile
Emita Whitemark
Whitemark and Emita are nearby Tasmanian areas with very different profiles. Emita has a much more qualified population, with 72.0% of residents completing Year 12 compared to 36.2% in Whitemark. Emita also has a far higher share of people with bachelor degrees (32.1% versus 18.9%) and a higher rate of volunteering at 56.6%. In contrast, Whitemark is more connected to services; 46.7% of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while 0.0% of homes in Emita have that access. This makes Whitemark mostly car-dependent, while Emita is described as car-dependent.
Everyday life is similar in both places, as they share a typical weekly personal income of around $680 to $700 and a very high rate of people living alone. Both areas also have a high proportion of residents aged 65 and over, which is far above the national figure. While they share these commonalities, some gaps have grown. For example, the difference in rental rates is stark, as 31.3% of households in Whitemark rent compared to just 11.5% in Emita.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 68
- First area, 2021: 59
- Second area, 2011: 444
- Second area, 2016: 301
- Second area, 2021: 308
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 60 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 58 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Whitemark: 0.0% males, 3.7% females
- 80–84 in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Whitemark: 1.3% males, 3.7% females
- 75–79 in Emita: 14.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Whitemark: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 70–74 in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Whitemark: 7.4% males, 5.0% females
- 65–69 in Emita: 10.0% males, 14.0% females; 65–69 in Whitemark: 7.0% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Emita: 0.0% males, 12.0% females; 60–64 in Whitemark: 5.0% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Emita: 0.0% males, 10.0% females; 55–59 in Whitemark: 5.4% males, 5.0% females
- 50–54 in Emita: 0.0% males, 14.0% females; 50–54 in Whitemark: 2.7% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Emita: 6.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Whitemark: 1.3% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Whitemark: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Whitemark: 2.3% males, 5.0% females
- 30–34 in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Whitemark: 1.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Whitemark: 1.3% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Whitemark: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Emita: 6.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Whitemark: 1.0% males, 1.7% females
- 10–14 in Emita: 6.0% males, 8.0% females; 10–14 in Whitemark: 2.3% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Whitemark: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Emita: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Whitemark: 1.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $511
- First area, 2021: $682
- Second area, 2011: $483
- Second area, 2016: $721
- Second area, 2021: $697
- First area, 2016: $824
- First area, 2021: $1,375
- Second area, 2011: $789
- Second area, 2016: $1,111
- Second area, 2021: $1,105
- First area, 2016: $1,958
- First area, 2021: $1,624
- Second area, 2011: $1,070
- Second area, 2016: $1,531
- Second area, 2021: $1,812
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 1.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $130
- First area, 2021: $215
- Second area, 2011: $54
- Second area, 2016: $101
- Second area, 2021: $135
- First area, 2016: $709
- First area, 2021: $916
- Second area, 2011: $975
- Second area, 2016: $758
- Second area, 2021: $808
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Emita with nearby areas
Compare Whitemark with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emita vs Whitemark [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60189/emita/vs/SAL60752/whitemark