Compare
North Walpole vs Trent
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 25 km apart · North Walpole profile · Trent profile
North Walpole Trent
North Walpole and Trent are both sparsely populated areas in Western Australia. North Walpole is larger and more established, with 108 residents and one school within 3 km. In contrast, Trent is largely non-residential with a population of 0. North Walpole also has slightly more rugged land, with a mean terrain slope of 9.7% compared to 8.5% in Trent.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining very remote with no public transport or nearby shops and services. They are both completely car-dependent, and neither area has any homes within a 15-minute walk of a park, school, or health clinic.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 93
- First area, 2021: 108
- Second area, 2011: 0
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 0
- First area, 2016: 55 yrs
- First area, 2021: 58 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2016: $537
- First area, 2021: $505
- First area, 2016: $933
- First area, 2021: $1,093
- First area, 2016: $1,312
- First area, 2021: $1,160
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare North Walpole with nearby areas
Compare Trent with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). North Walpole vs Trent [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL51152/north-walpole/vs/SAL51469/trent