Compare
Mount Claremont vs Swanbourne
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.3 km apart · Mount Claremont profile · Swanbourne profile
Mount Claremont Swanbourne
Mount Claremont and Swanbourne are neighbouring areas with similar populations. Mount Claremont is noticeably older, with a typical resident aged 45 and 22.3% of people aged 65 or over, compared to 38 and 16.9% in Swanbourne. The two areas differ sharply in local amenities: 76% of Swanbourne homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while Mount Claremont has 0%. However, Mount Claremont has more public transport stops per person and a far higher number of schools for its children.
Both areas share a similar lifestyle, with typical weekly family incomes of around $4,100 and almost identical unemployment rates. They are also alike in the number of people living in each home. While they share many traits, the gap in typical weekly personal income is widening, with Swanbourne's typical pay now $368 higher than in Mount Claremont.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,375
- First area, 2016: 4,616
- First area, 2021: 4,999
- Second area, 2011: 3,508
- Second area, 2016: 4,059
- Second area, 2021: 4,592
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Claremont: 1.2% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Swanbourne: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Mount Claremont: 1.5% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Swanbourne: 0.9% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Mount Claremont: 1.9% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Swanbourne: 1.5% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Mount Claremont: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 70–74 in Swanbourne: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Mount Claremont: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 65–69 in Swanbourne: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Mount Claremont: 2.8% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Swanbourne: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Mount Claremont: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 55–59 in Swanbourne: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Mount Claremont: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Swanbourne: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 45–49 in Mount Claremont: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 45–49 in Swanbourne: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Mount Claremont: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Swanbourne: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Mount Claremont: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 35–39 in Swanbourne: 2.4% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Mount Claremont: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 30–34 in Swanbourne: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Mount Claremont: 1.9% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Swanbourne: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 20–24 in Mount Claremont: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Swanbourne: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Mount Claremont: 4.5% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Swanbourne: 5.5% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Mount Claremont: 4.6% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Swanbourne: 5.6% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Mount Claremont: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Swanbourne: 3.9% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Mount Claremont: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Swanbourne: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $722
- First area, 2016: $814
- First area, 2021: $994
- Second area, 2011: $881
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,362
- First area, 2011: $1,826
- First area, 2016: $2,138
- First area, 2021: $2,835
- Second area, 2011: $2,493
- Second area, 2016: $2,961
- Second area, 2021: $3,418
- First area, 2011: $2,647
- First area, 2016: $3,292
- First area, 2021: $4,046
- Second area, 2011: $2,757
- Second area, 2016: $3,564
- Second area, 2021: $4,179
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $375
- First area, 2016: $475
- First area, 2021: $420
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $470
- First area, 2011: $2,780
- First area, 2016: $3,000
- First area, 2021: $3,033
- Second area, 2011: $2,600
- Second area, 2016: $3,090
- Second area, 2021: $3,504
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Claremont with nearby areas
Compare Swanbourne with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Claremont vs Swanbourne [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL51008/mount-claremont/vs/SAL51421/swanbourne