Compare
Manjimup vs Yanmah
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 15 km apart · Manjimup profile · Yanmah profile
Manjimup Yanmah
Manjimup and Yanmah are two nearby Western Australian areas with very different profiles. Manjimup is a larger hub where 34.0% of households rent, and 18.5% of the population are children under 15. It is described as somewhat walkable, with most homes within a 15-minute walk of parks, schools and shops. In contrast, Yanmah is sparsely populated and car-dependent, with a much older population where the typical resident is 53. Living arrangements also differ sharply; 55.6% of Yanmah homes are owned outright, and 22.6% of people work from home, compared to just 2.8% in Manjimup.
Both areas are similar in that about half of their residents have no religion, a figure that sits close to the national average. They also share a similar typical weekly family income and a similar number of people per home. However, the gaps between them are stark in terms of infrastructure and demographics, with Manjimup having a far higher number of public transport stops and a much higher share of children and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,293
- First area, 2016: 4,349
- First area, 2021: 4,279
- Second area, 2011: 513
- Second area, 2016: 135
- Second area, 2021: 145
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 53 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Manjimup: 1.0% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Yanmah: 3.6% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Manjimup: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Yanmah: 0.0% males, 2.9% females
- 75–79 in Manjimup: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Yanmah: 6.5% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Manjimup: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Yanmah: 5.1% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Manjimup: 2.9% males, 3.5% females; 65–69 in Yanmah: 8.0% males, 7.2% females
- 60–64 in Manjimup: 3.6% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Yanmah: 5.8% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Manjimup: 3.1% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Yanmah: 7.2% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Manjimup: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Yanmah: 2.2% males, 6.5% females
- 45–49 in Manjimup: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Yanmah: 9.4% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Manjimup: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Yanmah: 2.2% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Manjimup: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Yanmah: 0.0% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Manjimup: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Yanmah: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Manjimup: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Yanmah: 2.2% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Manjimup: 3.0% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Yanmah: 4.3% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Manjimup: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Yanmah: 5.8% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Manjimup: 3.7% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Yanmah: 0.0% males, 2.2% females
- 5–9 in Manjimup: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Yanmah: 0.0% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Manjimup: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Yanmah: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $502
- First area, 2016: $602
- First area, 2021: $674
- Second area, 2011: $481
- Second area, 2016: $703
- Second area, 2021: $771
- First area, 2011: $933
- First area, 2016: $1,118
- First area, 2021: $1,208
- Second area, 2011: $985
- Second area, 2016: $1,350
- Second area, 2021: $1,406
- First area, 2011: $1,151
- First area, 2016: $1,376
- First area, 2021: $1,593
- Second area, 2011: $1,069
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,674
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $160
- First area, 2016: $205
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2011: $100
- Second area, 2016: $135
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,244
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,148
- Second area, 2011: $1,200
- Second area, 2016: $1,717
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Manjimup with nearby areas
Compare Yanmah with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Manjimup vs Yanmah [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50891/manjimup/vs/SAL51671/yanmah