Compare
Lamington vs Parkeston
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.9 km apart · Lamington profile · Parkeston profile
Lamington Parkeston
Lamington (WA) and Parkeston are neighbouring areas with very different scales and populations. Lamington (WA) is a residential area where the typical resident is 33, while Parkeston is sparsely populated and far older, with a typical age of 62. There are also large gaps in wealth; typical weekly household income is far higher in Lamington (WA) at $2,886 compared to $1,399 in Parkeston. Lamington (WA) is somewhat walkable, with most homes within a 15-minute walk of a park, school or groceries, whereas Parkeston is car-dependent.
Both areas share a very similar school profile, with nearly identical average school sizes and advantage scores. This common ground stands out against their other differences, such as the size of their populations and the fact that residents are far older in Parkeston. While Lamington (WA) has far more public transport stops, Parkeston has a far higher number of stops and departures relative to its tiny population.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,278
- First area, 2016: 2,112
- First area, 2021: 2,036
- Second area, 2011: 105
- Second area, 2016: 60
- Second area, 2021: 5
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 62 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lamington: 0.2% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Lamington: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Lamington: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Lamington: 0.9% males, 1.1% females; 70–74 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Lamington: 1.6% males, 1.0% females; 65–69 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Lamington: 3.0% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 100.0% females
- 55–59 in Lamington: 3.6% males, 3.2% females; 55–59 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Lamington: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Lamington: 3.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Lamington: 3.3% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Lamington: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Lamington: 3.9% males, 4.0% females; 30–34 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Lamington: 4.6% males, 4.3% females; 25–29 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Lamington: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Lamington: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Lamington: 3.4% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Lamington: 4.4% males, 3.8% females; 5–9 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Lamington: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 0–4 in Parkeston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,005
- First area, 2016: $1,139
- First area, 2021: $1,430
- Second area, 2011: $268
- Second area, 2016: $252
- Second area, 2021: $2,500
- First area, 2011: $2,474
- First area, 2016: $2,396
- First area, 2021: $2,886
- Second area, 2011: $1,416
- Second area, 2016: $899
- Second area, 2021: $1,399
- First area, 2011: $2,621
- First area, 2016: $2,670
- First area, 2021: $3,166
- Second area, 2011: $739
- Second area, 2016: $762
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 1.0
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $350
- First area, 2021: $370
- Second area, 2011: $131
- Second area, 2016: $110
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $303
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 3.50
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Lamington with nearby areas
Compare Parkeston with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lamington vs Parkeston [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50829/lamington/vs/SAL51206/parkeston