Compare
Como vs Manning
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Como profile · Manning profile
Como Manning
Como (WA) and Manning are neighbouring areas with very different housing styles. Manning is dominated by separate houses, which are far more common there than in Como (WA), and 86.5% of Manning's homes have three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Como (WA) has more townhouses and flats, and is far more likely to have people living alone. This difference extends to the local environment; Como (WA) is much more connected to health services and public transport, with far more bus stops and a higher share of people commuting by transit. Manning has a higher share of children under 15 and more households earning $3,000 or more a week.
Everyday life is similar in both places, with residents sharing the same typical age of 38 and almost identical weekly rents around $340 to $350. Both areas also have similar school advantage scores and a nearly identical share of people with long-term health conditions. While Como (WA) has seen a far higher number of people move in over the last five years, both areas have maintained similar typical weekly personal incomes that sit just below the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 13,399
- First area, 2016: 14,138
- First area, 2021: 14,786
- Second area, 2011: 4,017
- Second area, 2016: 4,139
- Second area, 2021: 4,219
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Como: 1.4% males, 2.9% females; 85+ in Manning: 0.6% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Como: 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Manning: 0.6% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Como: 1.5% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Manning: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Como: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 70–74 in Manning: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Como: 2.4% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Manning: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Como: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Manning: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Como: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Manning: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Como: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Manning: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Como: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Manning: 2.7% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Como: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Manning: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Como: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Manning: 3.6% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Como: 4.5% males, 4.7% females; 30–34 in Manning: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Como: 4.4% males, 5.1% females; 25–29 in Manning: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Como: 3.8% males, 4.5% females; 20–24 in Manning: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 15–19 in Como: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Manning: 3.5% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Como: 1.9% males, 2.1% females; 10–14 in Manning: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Como: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 5–9 in Manning: 3.5% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Como: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Manning: 2.5% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $806
- First area, 2016: $871
- First area, 2021: $1,001
- Second area, 2011: $632
- Second area, 2016: $762
- Second area, 2021: $941
- First area, 2011: $1,432
- First area, 2016: $1,598
- First area, 2021: $1,780
- Second area, 2011: $1,451
- Second area, 2016: $1,817
- Second area, 2021: $2,208
- First area, 2011: $2,038
- First area, 2016: $2,225
- First area, 2021: $2,550
- Second area, 2011: $2,105
- Second area, 2016: $2,363
- Second area, 2021: $2,876
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $330
- First area, 2016: $365
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $239
- Second area, 2016: $325
- Second area, 2021: $340
- First area, 2011: $2,037
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,041
- Second area, 2011: $2,442
- Second area, 2016: $2,500
- Second area, 2021: $2,400
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Como with nearby areas
Compare Manning with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Como vs Manning [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50316/como/vs/SAL50893/manning