Compare
Cannington vs Queens Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.6 km apart · Cannington profile · Queens Park profile
Cannington Queens Park
Queens Park and Cannington are neighbouring areas in Western Australia with different housing and amenity profiles. Queens Park is more residential, with far more separate houses (76.0% compared to 46.2%) and a far higher share of homes with three or more bedrooms (82.9% versus 72.7%). Cannington is more urban and transient; it has a far higher share of renters (57.0% versus 40.3%) and a far higher proportion of recent overseas arrivals (31.5% versus 21.2%). This urban nature is reflected in its infrastructure, with far more public transport departures and a much larger number of people reachable by transit within 45 minutes.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people providing unpaid care. They are also very similar in terms of typical weekly personal income, which is $781 in both places. While they share these commonalities, the gap in local accessibility is stark: Cannington has far more health services within a 15-minute walk (94.7% versus 2.9%), while Queens Park has a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school (99.4% versus 70.7%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,275
- First area, 2016: 5,929
- First area, 2021: 6,875
- Second area, 2011: 5,380
- Second area, 2016: 6,655
- Second area, 2021: 7,268
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cannington: 0.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Queens Park: 0.2% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Cannington: 0.4% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Queens Park: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Cannington: 0.7% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Queens Park: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Cannington: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Queens Park: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 65–69 in Cannington: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 65–69 in Queens Park: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Cannington: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 60–64 in Queens Park: 1.6% males, 2.0% females
- 55–59 in Cannington: 1.8% males, 1.5% females; 55–59 in Queens Park: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 50–54 in Cannington: 1.8% males, 1.8% females; 50–54 in Queens Park: 3.2% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Cannington: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 45–49 in Queens Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Cannington: 3.3% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Queens Park: 4.2% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Cannington: 5.5% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Queens Park: 4.7% males, 4.9% females
- 30–34 in Cannington: 7.5% males, 6.5% females; 30–34 in Queens Park: 5.7% males, 5.6% females
- 25–29 in Cannington: 8.5% males, 8.3% females; 25–29 in Queens Park: 5.5% males, 5.1% females
- 20–24 in Cannington: 6.0% males, 5.8% females; 20–24 in Queens Park: 4.4% males, 3.9% females
- 15–19 in Cannington: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Queens Park: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Cannington: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 10–14 in Queens Park: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Cannington: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 5–9 in Queens Park: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Cannington: 4.2% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Queens Park: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $551
- First area, 2016: $564
- First area, 2021: $781
- Second area, 2011: $625
- Second area, 2016: $636
- Second area, 2021: $781
- First area, 2011: $1,165
- First area, 2016: $1,287
- First area, 2021: $1,558
- Second area, 2011: $1,313
- Second area, 2016: $1,477
- Second area, 2021: $1,723
- First area, 2011: $1,313
- First area, 2016: $1,380
- First area, 2021: $1,789
- Second area, 2011: $1,532
- Second area, 2016: $1,581
- Second area, 2021: $1,928
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $340
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $325
- Second area, 2016: $370
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,727
- First area, 2021: $1,512
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,640
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cannington with nearby areas
Compare Queens Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cannington vs Queens Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50246/cannington/vs/SAL51271/queens-park