Compare
Bruce Rock vs Shackleton
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 32 km apart · Bruce Rock profile · Shackleton profile
Bruce Rock Shackleton
Bruce Rock and Shackleton are nearby Western Australian areas with very different layouts and populations. Bruce Rock is more developed and somewhat walkable, with 66% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services. It has a much older population, with 29% aged 65 and over, and a higher share of people living alone at 35.2%. Shackleton is car-dependent and more sparsely populated, though it has a much higher typical family income of $2,749 per week, compared to $1,699 in Bruce Rock.
These two areas have tracked closely in some areas since 2011, such as their similar shares of renters and detached housing. They are also alike in their lack of public transport and a similar proportion of people earning over $2,000 a week. While Bruce Rock has far more people who volunteer (30.4%) and a higher share of those who have completed Year 12, both areas sit well below the national figure for school completion.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 721
- First area, 2016: 703
- First area, 2021: 742
- Second area, 2011: 254
- Second area, 2016: 96
- Second area, 2021: 114
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bruce Rock: 0.9% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Shackleton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bruce Rock: 2.7% males, 2.0% females; 80–84 in Shackleton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Bruce Rock: 1.6% males, 3.8% females; 75–79 in Shackleton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Bruce Rock: 5.3% males, 4.1% females; 70–74 in Shackleton: 8.7% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Bruce Rock: 4.2% males, 4.1% females; 65–69 in Shackleton: 6.7% males, 4.8% females
- 60–64 in Bruce Rock: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Shackleton: 3.8% males, 5.8% females
- 55–59 in Bruce Rock: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Shackleton: 0.0% males, 5.8% females
- 50–54 in Bruce Rock: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Shackleton: 6.7% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Bruce Rock: 1.9% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Shackleton: 2.9% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Bruce Rock: 3.1% males, 1.5% females; 40–44 in Shackleton: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Bruce Rock: 3.0% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Shackleton: 0.0% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Bruce Rock: 3.0% males, 2.0% females; 30–34 in Shackleton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Bruce Rock: 1.9% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Shackleton: 2.9% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Bruce Rock: 2.4% males, 0.8% females; 20–24 in Shackleton: 8.7% males, 9.6% females
- 15–19 in Bruce Rock: 2.8% males, 1.2% females; 15–19 in Shackleton: 0.0% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Bruce Rock: 4.2% males, 3.7% females; 10–14 in Shackleton: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Bruce Rock: 2.6% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Shackleton: 4.8% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Bruce Rock: 2.8% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Shackleton: 0.0% males, 4.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $508
- First area, 2016: $705
- First area, 2021: $746
- Second area, 2011: $489
- Second area, 2016: $674
- Second area, 2021: $1,140
- First area, 2011: $825
- First area, 2016: $1,138
- First area, 2021: $1,236
- Second area, 2011: $739
- Second area, 2016: $880
- Second area, 2021: $1,875
- First area, 2011: $1,125
- First area, 2016: $1,649
- First area, 2021: $1,699
- Second area, 2011: $1,104
- Second area, 2016: $1,875
- Second area, 2021: $2,749
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $75
- First area, 2016: $124
- First area, 2021: $160
- Second area, 2011: $25
- Second area, 2021: $138
- First area, 2011: $551
- First area, 2016: $860
- First area, 2021: $737
- Second area, 2011: $439
- Second area, 2016: $407
- Second area, 2021: $652
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.60
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bruce Rock with nearby areas
Compare Shackleton with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bruce Rock vs Shackleton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50196/bruce-rock/vs/SAL51341/shackleton