Compare
Belmont vs Redcliffe
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.6 km apart · Belmont profile · Redcliffe profile
Belmont Redcliffe
Belmont (WA) and Redcliffe (WA) are neighbouring areas in Greater Perth. Belmont (WA) is more walkable for daily needs, with 88.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 81.7% near health services, compared to 59.5% and 67.6% in Redcliffe (WA). Belmont (WA) also has a higher proportion of people born overseas (40.1%) and those who use another language at home (30.2%), while Redcliffe (WA) is older, with 16.7% of its population aged 65 and over. Education levels are higher in Belmont (WA), where 23.5% of adults have a bachelor degree or higher and 60.5% finished Year 12.
Both areas share a very similar typical weekly household income of around $1,560. This financial similarity exists alongside other shared traits, such as having nearly identical proportions of First Nations people and volunteers. While they track closely in many ways, some gaps are widening or shifting; for example, Belmont (WA) has seen more people move in over the last five years (43.6%) than Redcliffe (WA) (37.8%). Redcliffe (WA) remains better connected by transit, with far more people reachable within 45 minutes of travel.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,263
- First area, 2016: 6,785
- First area, 2021: 6,959
- Second area, 2011: 4,759
- Second area, 2016: 4,969
- Second area, 2021: 5,030
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Belmont: 0.8% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Redcliffe: 1.5% males, 2.6% females
- 80–84 in Belmont: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Redcliffe: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Belmont: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 75–79 in Redcliffe: 1.5% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Belmont: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Redcliffe: 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Belmont: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Redcliffe: 1.8% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Belmont: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Redcliffe: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Belmont: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Redcliffe: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Belmont: 3.2% males, 2.5% females; 50–54 in Redcliffe: 3.7% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Belmont: 3.6% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Redcliffe: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Belmont: 3.8% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Redcliffe: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Belmont: 4.7% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Redcliffe: 3.9% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Belmont: 5.1% males, 5.4% females; 30–34 in Redcliffe: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 25–29 in Belmont: 5.5% males, 4.5% females; 25–29 in Redcliffe: 4.2% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Belmont: 4.3% males, 3.5% females; 20–24 in Redcliffe: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Belmont: 2.2% males, 1.8% females; 15–19 in Redcliffe: 2.6% males, 1.9% females
- 10–14 in Belmont: 2.4% males, 1.9% females; 10–14 in Redcliffe: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Belmont: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Redcliffe: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Belmont: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Redcliffe: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $657
- First area, 2016: $731
- First area, 2021: $865
- Second area, 2011: $685
- Second area, 2016: $724
- Second area, 2021: $807
- First area, 2011: $1,197
- First area, 2016: $1,456
- First area, 2021: $1,557
- Second area, 2011: $1,360
- Second area, 2016: $1,449
- Second area, 2021: $1,565
- First area, 2011: $1,510
- First area, 2016: $1,801
- First area, 2021: $2,062
- Second area, 2011: $1,665
- Second area, 2016: $1,775
- Second area, 2021: $2,072
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $300
- First area, 2016: $350
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $260
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $330
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,863
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Belmont with nearby areas
Compare Redcliffe with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Belmont vs Redcliffe [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50105/belmont/vs/SAL51287/redcliffe