Compare
Beckenham vs Langford
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.4 km apart · Beckenham profile · Langford profile
Beckenham Langford
Beckenham and Langford are neighbouring areas in Western Australia with different profiles of accessibility and income. Beckenham is more walkable for daily needs, with 78.7% of homes within a 15 minute walk of groceries compared to just 25.3% in Langford. However, Langford has much better access to education, with far more schools per 1,000 children (2.73 versus 0.56). Beckenham is also the wealthier of the two; its typical household income is $1,667 a week, which is well higher than the $1,318 seen in Langford.
These two areas have tracked closely since 2011, though the gap in mobility has shifted as Beckenham has seen a much larger rise in people moving in over the last five years. They share many basic characteristics, such as having the same typical home size of 2.7 people and nearly identical proportions of children under 15. Both areas also have a similar share of First Nations residents, though those in Beckenham generally have higher personal incomes and a higher rate of speaking a First Nations language.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,625
- First area, 2016: 7,518
- First area, 2021: 9,092
- Second area, 2011: 5,529
- Second area, 2016: 5,671
- Second area, 2021: 5,505
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Beckenham: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Langford: 0.3% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Beckenham: 0.8% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Langford: 0.9% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Beckenham: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 75–79 in Langford: 1.1% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Beckenham: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Langford: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Beckenham: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 65–69 in Langford: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Beckenham: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Langford: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Beckenham: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 55–59 in Langford: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Beckenham: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Langford: 3.4% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Beckenham: 3.3% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Langford: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Beckenham: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Langford: 4.1% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Beckenham: 5.3% males, 4.5% females; 35–39 in Langford: 3.7% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Beckenham: 4.4% males, 5.1% females; 30–34 in Langford: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Beckenham: 5.0% males, 4.6% females; 25–29 in Langford: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 20–24 in Beckenham: 4.3% males, 3.7% females; 20–24 in Langford: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 15–19 in Beckenham: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Langford: 3.2% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Beckenham: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Langford: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Beckenham: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Langford: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Beckenham: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Langford: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $587
- First area, 2016: $601
- First area, 2021: $796
- Second area, 2011: $514
- Second area, 2016: $494
- Second area, 2021: $599
- First area, 2011: $1,213
- First area, 2016: $1,339
- First area, 2021: $1,667
- Second area, 2011: $1,112
- Second area, 2016: $1,203
- Second area, 2021: $1,318
- First area, 2011: $1,381
- First area, 2016: $1,451
- First area, 2021: $1,958
- Second area, 2011: $1,257
- Second area, 2016: $1,318
- Second area, 2021: $1,494
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $307
- First area, 2016: $350
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2011: $280
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,673
- First area, 2016: $1,800
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,603
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Beckenham with nearby areas
Compare Langford with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Beckenham vs Langford [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50090/beckenham/vs/SAL50833/langford