Compare
Banjup vs Hammond Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.3 km apart · Banjup profile · Hammond Park profile
Banjup Hammond Park
Hammond Park and Banjup are neighbouring areas in Western Australia with very different characters. Hammond Park is a young, diverse hub where the typical resident is 31 and 27.8% of people are children under 15. It is far more walkable (somewhat walkable) than Banjup (car-dependent), with many more people living within a 15-minute walk of schools, parks and health services. In contrast, Banjup is older, with a typical resident aged 42 and a much higher share of seniors at 16.8%. Residents in Banjup are far more likely to own their homes outright, with 43.8% doing so compared to just 10% in Hammond Park.
These two areas have tracked differently since 2011, but they still share several common traits today. Both have similar typical weekly household incomes, around $2,450 to $2,500, and nearly the same proportion of people who do not follow a religion. They also share a similar drive time to the city of about 21 to 22 minutes. While Hammond Park has seen far more growth in its working population and the number of people moving in recently, both areas remain comfortably above the national figure for the share of people born overseas.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,402
- First area, 2016: 2,085
- First area, 2021: 1,377
- Second area, 2011: 2,434
- Second area, 2016: 4,886
- Second area, 2021: 6,985
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Banjup: 0.2% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Hammond Park: 0.1% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Banjup: 0.7% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Hammond Park: 0.1% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Banjup: 1.8% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Hammond Park: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 70–74 in Banjup: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Hammond Park: 0.7% males, 0.6% females
- 65–69 in Banjup: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Hammond Park: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 60–64 in Banjup: 3.9% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Hammond Park: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Banjup: 4.4% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Hammond Park: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 50–54 in Banjup: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Hammond Park: 2.2% males, 2.1% females
- 45–49 in Banjup: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Hammond Park: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Banjup: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Hammond Park: 4.7% males, 4.5% females
- 35–39 in Banjup: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Hammond Park: 6.2% males, 6.3% females
- 30–34 in Banjup: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Hammond Park: 4.8% males, 5.8% females
- 25–29 in Banjup: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Hammond Park: 4.7% males, 4.7% females
- 20–24 in Banjup: 3.9% males, 4.0% females; 20–24 in Hammond Park: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Banjup: 4.0% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Hammond Park: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Banjup: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Hammond Park: 3.9% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Banjup: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 5–9 in Hammond Park: 5.4% males, 4.7% females
- 0–4 in Banjup: 2.9% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Hammond Park: 5.5% males, 4.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $705
- First area, 2016: $867
- First area, 2021: $860
- Second area, 2011: $1,011
- Second area, 2016: $1,035
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: $2,175
- First area, 2016: $2,250
- First area, 2021: $2,507
- Second area, 2011: $2,137
- Second area, 2016: $2,252
- Second area, 2021: $2,446
- First area, 2011: $2,191
- First area, 2016: $2,243
- First area, 2021: $2,750
- Second area, 2011: $2,216
- Second area, 2016: $2,322
- Second area, 2021: $2,628
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $440
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $395
- Second area, 2016: $420
- Second area, 2021: $410
- First area, 2011: $2,123
- First area, 2016: $2,340
- First area, 2021: $2,100
- Second area, 2011: $2,535
- Second area, 2016: $2,383
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Banjup with nearby areas
Compare Hammond Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Banjup vs Hammond Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50068/banjup/vs/SAL50610/hammond-park