Compare
Rocky Camp vs Tantanoola
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Rocky Camp profile · Tantanoola profile
Rocky Camp Tantanoola
Tantanoola and Rocky Camp are two nearby South Australian areas with very different layouts. Tantanoola is more walkable, with 34.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park, while Rocky Camp has no such homes. There are also stark differences in demographics: First Nations residents are far older in Tantanoola than in Rocky Camp, where the age gap is 47 years. Tantanoola also has a higher share of people in de facto relationships (14.5% compared to 3.0%) and more people living alone (31.5% versus 20.4%).
Typical weekly incomes are very similar in both places, sitting around $640 to $655. This shared economic profile exists alongside other differences, such as Rocky Camp having a far higher share of homes owned outright (57.1% versus 46.4%) and no households renting at all. While both areas are far below the national figure for Year 12 completions, Rocky Camp is slightly higher at 40.5% compared to Tantanoola's 37.1%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 254
- First area, 2016: 141
- First area, 2021: 133
- Second area, 2011: 524
- Second area, 2016: 496
- Second area, 2021: 457
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 49 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rocky Camp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Tantanoola: 0.0% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Rocky Camp: 2.1% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Tantanoola: 2.4% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Rocky Camp: 2.1% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Tantanoola: 2.4% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Rocky Camp: 2.8% males, 4.3% females; 70–74 in Tantanoola: 3.1% males, 2.6% females
- 65–69 in Rocky Camp: 5.7% males, 4.3% females; 65–69 in Tantanoola: 6.2% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Rocky Camp: 6.4% males, 2.1% females; 60–64 in Tantanoola: 4.4% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Rocky Camp: 5.0% males, 5.0% females; 55–59 in Tantanoola: 4.2% males, 5.1% females
- 50–54 in Rocky Camp: 2.8% males, 7.1% females; 50–54 in Tantanoola: 4.2% males, 4.8% females
- 45–49 in Rocky Camp: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Tantanoola: 2.0% males, 5.1% females
- 40–44 in Rocky Camp: 2.8% males, 2.1% females; 40–44 in Tantanoola: 1.5% males, 2.0% females
- 35–39 in Rocky Camp: 3.5% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Tantanoola: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Rocky Camp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Tantanoola: 1.5% males, 0.9% females
- 25–29 in Rocky Camp: 2.1% males, 4.3% females; 25–29 in Tantanoola: 2.0% males, 1.5% females
- 20–24 in Rocky Camp: 2.1% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Tantanoola: 1.8% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Rocky Camp: 5.0% males, 4.3% females; 15–19 in Tantanoola: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 10–14 in Rocky Camp: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Tantanoola: 4.0% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Rocky Camp: 2.1% males, 5.0% females; 5–9 in Tantanoola: 1.8% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Rocky Camp: 0.0% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Tantanoola: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $573
- First area, 2016: $569
- First area, 2021: $655
- Second area, 2011: $482
- Second area, 2016: $564
- Second area, 2021: $638
- First area, 2011: $1,042
- First area, 2016: $1,292
- First area, 2021: $1,343
- Second area, 2011: $1,037
- Second area, 2016: $1,169
- Second area, 2021: $1,287
- First area, 2011: $1,166
- First area, 2016: $1,458
- First area, 2021: $1,531
- Second area, 2011: $1,204
- Second area, 2016: $1,476
- Second area, 2021: $1,758
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $125
- First area, 2016: $100
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $60
- Second area, 2016: $120
- Second area, 2021: $160
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,127
- Second area, 2011: $867
- Second area, 2016: $910
- Second area, 2021: $900
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Rocky Camp with nearby areas
Compare Tantanoola with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rocky Camp vs Tantanoola [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL41268/rocky-camp/vs/SAL41419/tantanoola