Compare
Hambidge vs Kielpa
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 29 km apart · Hambidge profile · Kielpa profile
Hambidge Kielpa
Kielpa and Hambidge are both sparsely populated rural areas in South Australia. Kielpa is the larger of the two with 55 residents, while Hambidge is effectively non-residential with a population of 0. Because of this, Kielpa has a far larger number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, public transport stops, and schools within 3 km, though all these figures remain at zero.
These two areas are almost identical in their layout and lack of services. Both are completely car-dependent and have no homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, health services, or schools. This lack of local infrastructure is a shared trait that has remained constant for both places over time.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2016: 63
- Second area, 2021: 55
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- Second area, 2016: $700
- Second area, 2021: $665
- Second area, 2016: $1,062
- Second area, 2021: $1,187
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,375
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Hambidge with nearby areas
Compare Kielpa with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Hambidge vs Kielpa [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40555/hambidge/vs/SAL40691/kielpa