Compare
Daw Park vs Pasadena
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.5 km apart · Daw Park profile · Pasadena profile
Daw Park Pasadena
Pasadena and Daw Park are neighbouring areas in South Australia with different demographic profiles. Pasadena is far older, with a typical resident aged 49 and 33.3% of the population aged 65 and over. In contrast, Daw Park is younger, with a typical age of 39 and 19.2% of residents aged 65 and over. Housing also differs, as Pasadena has far more separate houses (67.2% compared to 51.4%) and more homes with three or more bedrooms. Daw Park is more likely to be rented, with 32.2% of households renting compared to 18.5% in Pasadena.
Daily life in both places shares several commonalities, including the same typical travel time to the city and an equal number of people per home. They also have similar levels of school advantage and very similar shares of people who have served in the Defence Force. While they are alike in these ways, the two areas differ in their accessibility; Daw Park has far more homes within a 15-minute walk of schools and groceries, whereas Pasadena has a higher number of walkable amenities per 1,000 residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,440
- First area, 2016: 2,672
- First area, 2021: 2,705
- Second area, 2011: 2,893
- Second area, 2016: 2,993
- Second area, 2021: 3,073
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 49 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Daw Park: 1.4% males, 3.1% females; 85+ in Pasadena: 3.0% males, 4.4% females
- 80–84 in Daw Park: 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Pasadena: 2.2% males, 3.7% females
- 75–79 in Daw Park: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Pasadena: 3.0% males, 3.7% females
- 70–74 in Daw Park: 2.0% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Pasadena: 2.7% males, 4.0% females
- 65–69 in Daw Park: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Pasadena: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 60–64 in Daw Park: 2.1% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Pasadena: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Daw Park: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Pasadena: 2.2% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Daw Park: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Pasadena: 3.1% males, 2.4% females
- 45–49 in Daw Park: 3.1% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in Pasadena: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 40–44 in Daw Park: 2.7% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Pasadena: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Daw Park: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Pasadena: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Daw Park: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Pasadena: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Daw Park: 3.4% males, 4.1% females; 25–29 in Pasadena: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Daw Park: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Pasadena: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Daw Park: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Pasadena: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Daw Park: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Pasadena: 2.6% males, 2.1% females
- 5–9 in Daw Park: 2.9% males, 2.1% females; 5–9 in Pasadena: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Daw Park: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Pasadena: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $589
- First area, 2016: $663
- First area, 2021: $797
- Second area, 2011: $500
- Second area, 2016: $569
- Second area, 2021: $701
- First area, 2011: $1,026
- First area, 2016: $1,277
- First area, 2021: $1,639
- Second area, 2011: $946
- Second area, 2016: $1,153
- Second area, 2021: $1,381
- First area, 2011: $1,616
- First area, 2016: $1,674
- First area, 2021: $2,265
- Second area, 2011: $1,198
- Second area, 2016: $1,413
- Second area, 2021: $1,913
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $240
- Second area, 2016: $290
- Second area, 2021: $333
- First area, 2011: $1,560
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,800
- Second area, 2011: $1,415
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Daw Park with nearby areas
Compare Pasadena with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Daw Park vs Pasadena [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40354/daw-park/vs/SAL41120/pasadena