Compare
Commonwealth Hill vs Marla
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 166 km apart · Commonwealth Hill profile · Marla profile
Commonwealth Hill Marla
Marla and Commonwealth Hill are both sparsely populated areas of South Australia. Marla has a small population of 38 people, while Commonwealth Hill is largely non-residential with no residents. Marla is much more functional for pedestrians, with a walkability score of 3.2 (mostly car-dependent) compared to 0.0 (car-dependent) in Commonwealth Hill. In Marla, 92.1% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services, whereas in Commonwealth Hill, these figures are 0.0%.
Everyday life in both places is heavily reliant on cars, as neither area has any homes within a short walk of public transport or schools. Both locations are also nearly flat, though the mean terrain slope is a little higher in Marla at 2.2% compared to 1.1% in Commonwealth Hill.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2016: 100
- Second area, 2021: 38
- Second area, 2016: 56 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- Second area, 2016: $687
- Second area, 2021: $1,075
- Second area, 2016: $900
- Second area, 2021: $1,374
- Second area, 2016: $1,875
- Second area, 2021: $2,166
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- Second area, 2016: 1.3
- Second area, 2021: 1.6
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Commonwealth Hill with nearby areas
Compare Marla with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Commonwealth Hill vs Marla [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40290/commonwealth-hill/vs/SAL40834/marla