Compare
Bungama vs Napperby
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.1 km apart · Bungama profile · Napperby profile
Bungama Napperby
Napperby and Bungama are neighbouring rural areas in South Australia. Napperby has a larger population and is more walkable, with 51.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park compared to 0.0% in Bungama. There are notable differences in health and wealth; Napperby has far more people with a long-term health condition (38.4% compared to 25.0% in Bungama) and a larger share of high-income households earning $3,000 or more a week (14.6% versus 0.0%). Bungama, however, has a much higher proportion of children under 15 (32.8% compared to 20.6% in Napperby) and a far higher unemployment rate of 19.6%.
These two areas share a typical resident age of 44 and very similar typical weekly family incomes. While they track closely in many ways, the gap in unemployment has widened, with Bungama now sitting far above Napperby. Both areas are largely car-dependent, and neither has any public transport stops or departures per 1,000 people.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 110
- First area, 2021: 116
- Second area, 2011: 633
- Second area, 2016: 665
- Second area, 2021: 666
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bungama: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Napperby: 0.0% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Bungama: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Napperby: 1.3% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Bungama: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Napperby: 2.5% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Bungama: 3.1% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Napperby: 3.1% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Bungama: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 65–69 in Napperby: 4.5% males, 3.9% females
- 60–64 in Bungama: 10.3% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Napperby: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Bungama: 0.0% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Napperby: 4.0% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Bungama: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Napperby: 3.1% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Bungama: 0.0% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in Napperby: 4.2% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Bungama: 3.1% males, 5.2% females; 40–44 in Napperby: 2.8% males, 1.8% females
- 35–39 in Bungama: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Napperby: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Bungama: 0.0% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Napperby: 1.8% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Bungama: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Napperby: 1.0% males, 0.4% females
- 20–24 in Bungama: 7.2% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Napperby: 3.0% males, 1.3% females
- 15–19 in Bungama: 6.2% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Napperby: 3.4% males, 4.0% females
- 10–14 in Bungama: 12.4% males, 7.2% females; 10–14 in Napperby: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 5–9 in Bungama: 5.2% males, 6.2% females; 5–9 in Napperby: 4.5% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Bungama: 3.1% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Napperby: 2.8% males, 1.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $462
- First area, 2021: $656
- Second area, 2011: $461
- Second area, 2016: $467
- Second area, 2021: $533
- First area, 2016: $1,333
- First area, 2021: $1,312
- Second area, 2011: $1,104
- Second area, 2016: $1,059
- Second area, 2021: $1,176
- First area, 2016: $1,458
- First area, 2021: $1,406
- Second area, 2011: $1,174
- Second area, 2016: $1,319
- Second area, 2021: $1,463
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $100
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2016: $932
- First area, 2021: $938
- Second area, 2011: $1,343
- Second area, 2016: $1,235
- Second area, 2021: $1,083
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Bungama with nearby areas
Compare Napperby with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bungama vs Napperby [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40188/bungama/vs/SAL41010/napperby