Compare
Anama vs Marola
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.3 km apart · Anama profile · Marola profile
Anama Marola
Marola and Anama are both sparsely populated areas in South Australia. There are significant differences in their residents and households; the typical person in Marola is far older at 42 compared to 29 in Anama. This is consistent with the much larger households in Marola, where five people typically live per home and 1.2 people share each bedroom, whereas Anama averages just 1.5 people per home and 0.4 per bedroom. Weekly personal income is also far higher in Marola at $1,562, compared to $725 in Anama.
Both areas are entirely car-dependent, with no amenities, parks, or public transport within a 15-minute walk. They are also similarly remote, with drive times to the city sitting between 116 and 127 minutes. These shared traits highlight the isolated nature of both places, even as the age and income gaps between them remain stark.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 14
- First area, 2021: 7
- Second area, 2016: 12
- Second area, 2021: 8
Age structure
Marital status
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $849
- First area, 2021: $725
- Second area, 2016: $1,062
- Second area, 2021: $1,562
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
First Nations
Family & Households
Family composition
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Anama with nearby areas
Compare Marola with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Anama vs Marola [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40021/anama/vs/SAL40836/marola