Compare
Paluma vs Wharps
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 42 km apart · Paluma profile · Wharps profile
Paluma Wharps
Paluma and Wharps are both sparsely populated areas in Queensland. Paluma is the larger of the two with 87 residents, and it is more walkable, with a walkability score of 0.9 (car-dependent) and 38.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park. In contrast, Wharps is largely non-residential with a population of 0 and has much steeper terrain, with a mean slope of 69.6% compared to 14.3% in Paluma. Wharps also has more schools within 3 km, with one school compared to none in Paluma.
Both areas are heavily car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, health services, or public transport. This shared lack of local amenities is a defining feature for both places. While Paluma has slightly more amenity types within a 15-minute walk, both areas remain remote and largely without a connected street network.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Paluma with nearby areas
Compare Wharps with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Paluma vs Wharps [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL32267/paluma/vs/SAL33055/wharps