Compare
Mount Ommaney vs Westlake
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.8 km apart · Mount Ommaney profile · Westlake profile
Mount Ommaney Westlake
Westlake and Mount Ommaney are neighbouring suburbs in Brisbane with distinct profiles. Westlake is more heavily residential, with separate houses making up 97.1% of homes, compared to 77.2% in Mount Ommaney. Mount Ommaney is far more walkable, with a score of 6.5 (very walkable) and 86.6% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a "15-minute city" hub. In contrast, Westlake is only somewhat walkable (4.2) and just 28.7% of homes have that same access. Mount Ommaney also has a noticeably older population, with a typical resident aged 48 and a higher share of seniors at 26.9%.
These two areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining quite alike in many ways. They both have similar typical family incomes, and a nearly identical share of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher. Both suburbs also stand out for their cultural diversity, as the share of people born overseas is well above the national figure in both places. However, some gaps have shifted, such as the age of First Nations residents, who are now far older in Mount Ommaney (+16 years gap).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,334
- First area, 2016: 2,360
- First area, 2021: 2,503
- Second area, 2011: 4,380
- Second area, 2016: 4,368
- Second area, 2021: 4,547
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Ommaney: 1.6% males, 2.8% females; 85+ in Westlake: 0.4% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Mount Ommaney: 1.3% males, 2.0% females; 80–84 in Westlake: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Mount Ommaney: 2.8% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Westlake: 1.7% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Mount Ommaney: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 70–74 in Westlake: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Mount Ommaney: 3.3% males, 4.1% females; 65–69 in Westlake: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 60–64 in Mount Ommaney: 3.0% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Westlake: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Mount Ommaney: 3.9% males, 3.5% females; 55–59 in Westlake: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 50–54 in Mount Ommaney: 2.6% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Westlake: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Mount Ommaney: 2.5% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Westlake: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Mount Ommaney: 3.1% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Westlake: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Mount Ommaney: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Westlake: 2.8% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Mount Ommaney: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Westlake: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Mount Ommaney: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Westlake: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Mount Ommaney: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Westlake: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Mount Ommaney: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Westlake: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Mount Ommaney: 3.7% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Westlake: 4.0% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Mount Ommaney: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Westlake: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Mount Ommaney: 2.0% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Westlake: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $722
- First area, 2016: $843
- First area, 2021: $853
- Second area, 2011: $770
- Second area, 2016: $800
- Second area, 2021: $1,007
- First area, 2011: $2,125
- First area, 2016: $2,012
- First area, 2021: $2,361
- Second area, 2011: $2,262
- Second area, 2016: $2,259
- Second area, 2021: $2,691
- First area, 2011: $2,442
- First area, 2016: $2,409
- First area, 2021: $2,724
- Second area, 2011: $2,316
- Second area, 2016: $2,393
- Second area, 2021: $2,839
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $500
- First area, 2016: $540
- First area, 2021: $540
- Second area, 2011: $429
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $550
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,316
- Second area, 2011: $2,150
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,247
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Ommaney with nearby areas
Compare Westlake with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Ommaney vs Westlake [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL32009/mount-ommaney/vs/SAL33049/westlake