Compare
Morton Vale vs Regency Downs
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.3 km apart · Morton Vale profile · Regency Downs profile
Morton Vale Regency Downs
Regency Downs and Morton Vale are neighbouring areas in the Lockyer Valley with very different profiles. Regency Downs is a much larger community with a young population, where 24.1% of residents are children under 15 and the typical age is 37. This is consistent with a higher share of people caring for children unpaid (31.3%) and a larger proportion of homes with three or more bedrooms (91.2%). In contrast, Morton Vale is sparsely populated and much older, with a typical age of 53 and 27.2% of residents aged 65 and over. The typical weekly household income in Regency Downs is also far higher at $1,570, compared to $850 in Morton Vale.
Both areas are almost entirely car-dependent, as they lack walkable amenities and public transport. They also share a similar proportion of adults with a bachelor degree or higher. A notable shift is seen in how people live and work; the gap in home ownership is widening, with homes owned outright far higher in Morton Vale (42.9%) while mortgage holders are far more common in Regency Downs (55.0%). This aligns with a larger share of adults working or looking for work in Regency Downs, whereas 25.0% of Morton Vale residents work from home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 263
- First area, 2016: 143
- First area, 2021: 114
- Second area, 2011: 2,097
- Second area, 2016: 2,306
- Second area, 2021: 2,623
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 48 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Morton Vale: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Regency Downs: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Morton Vale: 0.0% males, 4.2% females; 80–84 in Regency Downs: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Morton Vale: 5.2% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Regency Downs: 1.4% males, 0.8% females
- 70–74 in Morton Vale: 8.3% males, 4.2% females; 70–74 in Regency Downs: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Morton Vale: 6.3% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Regency Downs: 2.4% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Morton Vale: 10.4% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Regency Downs: 3.4% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Morton Vale: 0.0% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Regency Downs: 3.2% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Morton Vale: 11.5% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Regency Downs: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Morton Vale: 3.1% males, 4.2% females; 45–49 in Regency Downs: 3.8% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Morton Vale: 0.0% males, 6.3% females; 40–44 in Regency Downs: 2.5% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Morton Vale: 3.1% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Regency Downs: 3.1% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Morton Vale: 0.0% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Regency Downs: 3.1% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Morton Vale: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Regency Downs: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Morton Vale: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Regency Downs: 2.3% males, 1.8% females
- 15–19 in Morton Vale: 4.2% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Regency Downs: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Morton Vale: 5.2% males, 4.2% females; 10–14 in Regency Downs: 4.9% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Morton Vale: 0.0% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Regency Downs: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Morton Vale: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Regency Downs: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $488
- First area, 2016: $412
- First area, 2021: $479
- Second area, 2011: $449
- Second area, 2016: $540
- Second area, 2021: $660
- First area, 2011: $1,031
- First area, 2016: $788
- First area, 2021: $850
- Second area, 2011: $1,020
- Second area, 2016: $1,296
- Second area, 2021: $1,570
- First area, 2011: $1,125
- First area, 2016: $1,050
- First area, 2021: $1,375
- Second area, 2011: $1,169
- Second area, 2016: $1,408
- Second area, 2021: $1,711
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $100
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $285
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $368
- First area, 2011: $1,625
- First area, 2016: $1,365
- First area, 2021: $1,192
- Second area, 2011: $1,600
- Second area, 2016: $1,552
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Morton Vale with nearby areas
Compare Regency Downs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Morton Vale vs Regency Downs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31924/morton-vale/vs/SAL32416/regency-downs