Compare
Marcus Beach vs Peregian Springs
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.2 km apart · Marcus Beach profile · Peregian Springs profile
Marcus Beach Peregian Springs
Peregian Springs and Marcus Beach are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Peregian Springs is a growing hub where 64.5% of people moved in during the last five years, and it is much younger, with a typical resident aged 39. It has far more families, with 24.6% of the population being children under 15, and 37.5% of homes are rented. In contrast, Marcus Beach is far older, with a typical age of 48, and is more established, as 44.6% of homes are owned outright. While Peregian Springs has more walkable services like schools and groceries, Marcus Beach has a higher share of separate houses at 89.5%.
Both areas share a similar financial profile, with typical weekly personal incomes sitting around $800. They also have an almost identical share of recent arrivals from overseas at 13.1%. Despite these similarities, their populations are moving in different directions; Peregian Springs is attracting many new residents, while Marcus Beach remains a quieter area with a higher proportion of people aged 65 and over.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 764
- First area, 2016: 757
- First area, 2021: 839
- Second area, 2011: 3,949
- Second area, 2016: 7,065
- Second area, 2021: 9,532
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 48 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Marcus Beach: 0.0% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Peregian Springs: 0.7% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Marcus Beach: 1.4% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Peregian Springs: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Marcus Beach: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Peregian Springs: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Marcus Beach: 2.4% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Peregian Springs: 2.4% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Marcus Beach: 3.5% males, 4.2% females; 65–69 in Peregian Springs: 2.1% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Marcus Beach: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 60–64 in Peregian Springs: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Marcus Beach: 5.2% males, 4.8% females; 55–59 in Peregian Springs: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Marcus Beach: 4.0% males, 4.8% females; 50–54 in Peregian Springs: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Marcus Beach: 3.4% males, 4.2% females; 45–49 in Peregian Springs: 3.9% males, 4.3% females
- 40–44 in Marcus Beach: 2.3% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Peregian Springs: 3.8% males, 4.6% females
- 35–39 in Marcus Beach: 2.8% males, 1.9% females; 35–39 in Peregian Springs: 3.5% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Marcus Beach: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Peregian Springs: 1.8% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Marcus Beach: 2.8% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Peregian Springs: 1.6% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Marcus Beach: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 20–24 in Peregian Springs: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Marcus Beach: 3.4% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Peregian Springs: 3.7% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Marcus Beach: 3.6% males, 2.5% females; 10–14 in Peregian Springs: 4.9% males, 4.7% females
- 5–9 in Marcus Beach: 2.2% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Peregian Springs: 4.5% males, 4.2% females
- 0–4 in Marcus Beach: 3.1% males, 1.7% females; 0–4 in Peregian Springs: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $565
- First area, 2016: $686
- First area, 2021: $794
- Second area, 2011: $594
- Second area, 2016: $691
- Second area, 2021: $813
- First area, 2011: $1,233
- First area, 2016: $1,383
- First area, 2021: $1,613
- Second area, 2011: $1,340
- Second area, 2016: $1,493
- Second area, 2021: $1,836
- First area, 2011: $1,418
- First area, 2016: $1,609
- First area, 2021: $2,055
- Second area, 2011: $1,378
- Second area, 2016: $1,591
- Second area, 2021: $2,026
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $375
- First area, 2021: $468
- Second area, 2011: $450
- Second area, 2016: $480
- Second area, 2021: $530
- First area, 2011: $1,843
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,975
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,100
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Marcus Beach with nearby areas
Compare Peregian Springs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Marcus Beach vs Peregian Springs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31762/marcus-beach/vs/SAL32299/peregian-springs