Compare

Lake Manchester vs Mount Crosby

Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.2 km apart · Lake Manchester profile · Mount Crosby profile

Lake Manchester Mount Crosby

Mount Crosby and Lake Manchester are neighbouring areas in Queensland with very different levels of activity. Mount Crosby is the more established of the two, with a population of 1,860 and a typical weekly household income of $2,993, which is far above the national figure. In contrast, Lake Manchester is sparsely populated with only 17 residents. The two differ sharply in accessibility; Mount Crosby has a 28-minute drive time to the city, while the trip from Lake Manchester takes 204 minutes. This is reflected in the cost of housing, as the typical monthly home loan payment in Mount Crosby is $2,095, far higher than the $1,050 seen in Lake Manchester.

Both areas are essentially car-dependent, as neither has any homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport. They also share a similar typical resident age, with Mount Crosby at 42 and Lake Manchester slightly older at 44. While Mount Crosby has more street connectivity and a larger number of schools, both areas are mostly made up of couples with children.

Where they differ most

Demographics & Identity

Population in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +1,843 larger in Mount Crosby gap steady
17 12th pct 1,860 77th pct
  • First area, 2016: 23
  • First area, 2021: 17
  • Second area, 2011: 1,728
  • Second area, 2016: 1,832
  • Second area, 2021: 1,860
Median age in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +2 yrs older in Lake Manchester gap narrowing
44 yrs 46th pct 42 yrs 38th pct
  • First area, 2016: 34 yrs
  • First area, 2021: 44 yrs
  • Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
  • Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
  • Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
— 1.3% 43rd pct
  • First area, 2016: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 1.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 1.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 1.3%
— 11.8% 22nd pct
  • First area, 2016: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 5.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 7.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 11.8%
— 20.9% 75th pct
  • First area, 2016: 26.1%
  • Second area, 2011: 27.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 25.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 20.9%
— 10.2% 34th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 9.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 10.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 10.2%

Age structure

35.3% Seniors (65+) ◂ +23.5 pts 11.8%
29.4% Older adults (45–64) +4.7 pts ▸ 34.1%
17.6% Children (0–14) +3.3 pts ▸ 20.9%
17.6% Young adults (25–44) +1.3 pts ▸ 18.9%
0.0% Youth (15–24) +14.1 pts ▸ 14.1%

Marital status

61.1% Married ◂ +3.3 pts 57.8%
22.2% Never married +8.0 pts ▸ 30.2%
0.0% Divorced +6.4 pts ▸ 6.4%
0.0% Widowed +2.8 pts ▸ 2.8%
0.0% Separated +2.6 pts ▸ 2.6%

Age & sex structure

Lake Manchester Mount Crosby

Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.

  • 85+ in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Crosby: 0.6% males, 0.2% females
  • 80–84 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Crosby: 0.5% males, 0.2% females
  • 75–79 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Crosby: 1.2% males, 1.0% females
  • 70–74 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 66.7% females; 70–74 in Mount Crosby: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
  • 65–69 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Mount Crosby: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
  • 60–64 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Mount Crosby: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
  • 55–59 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Mount Crosby: 4.8% males, 3.7% females
  • 50–54 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Mount Crosby: 4.7% males, 6.0% females
  • 45–49 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Mount Crosby: 5.2% males, 4.4% females
  • 40–44 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Mount Crosby: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
  • 35–39 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Crosby: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
  • 30–34 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Mount Crosby: 1.1% males, 1.7% females
  • 25–29 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Crosby: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
  • 20–24 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Crosby: 2.2% males, 2.1% females
  • 15–19 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Crosby: 5.1% males, 4.8% females
  • 10–14 in Lake Manchester: 33.3% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Mount Crosby: 5.3% males, 4.7% females
  • 5–9 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Mount Crosby: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
  • 0–4 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Crosby: 2.2% males, 2.4% females

Ancestry & Birthplace

— 21.7% 79th pct
  • First area, 2016: 13.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 22.8%
  • Second area, 2016: 23.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 21.7%

Country of birth

76.5% Australia ◂ +0.6 pts 75.9%
0.0% England +6.3 pts ▸ 6.3%
0.0% South Africa +2.8 pts ▸ 2.8%
0.0% New Zealand +2.6 pts ▸ 2.6%
0.0% India +0.3 pts ▸ 0.3%
0.0% China +0.2 pts ▸ 0.2%
0.0% Philippines +0.2 pts ▸ 0.2%
0.0% Vietnam even 0.0%
0.0% Nepal even 0.0%
0.0% Italy even 0.0%

Ancestry

58.8% Australian ◂ +24.5 pts 34.3%
47.1% English ◂ +0.2 pts 46.8%
41.2% Scottish ◂ +28.2 pts 13.0%
0.0% Irish +14.7 pts ▸ 14.7%
0.0% German +7.2 pts ▸ 7.2%
0.0% Dutch +3.2 pts ▸ 3.2%
0.0% Italian +2.5 pts ▸ 2.5%
0.0% Chinese +1.2 pts ▸ 1.2%
0.0% Indian +0.8 pts ▸ 0.8%
0.0% Greek +0.8 pts ▸ 0.8%
0.0% Filipino +0.5 pts ▸ 0.5%
0.0% Vietnamese even 0.0%

Language

— 6.8% 68th pct
  • First area, 2016: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 6.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 6.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 6.8%
— 0.2% 62nd pct
  • First area, 2016: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 0.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 0.2%

Language used at home

100.0% English only ◂ +9.0 pts 91.0%
0.0% Hindi +0.3 pts ▸ 0.3%
0.0% Mandarin +0.3 pts ▸ 0.3%
0.0% Italian +0.2 pts ▸ 0.2%
0.0% Cantonese +0.2 pts ▸ 0.2%
0.0% Arabic even 0.0%
0.0% Vietnamese even 0.0%
0.0% Punjabi even 0.0%
0.0% Greek even 0.0%
0.0% Tagalog even 0.0%

Religion

— 47.3% 72nd pct
  • First area, 2016: 17.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 27.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 36.6%
  • Second area, 2021: 47.3%

Religious affiliation

52.9% No religion ◂ +5.6 pts 47.3%
47.1% Christianity ◂ +1.3 pts 45.8%
0.0% Not stated +4.5 pts ▸ 4.5%
0.0% Other religions +0.9 pts ▸ 0.9%
0.0% Hinduism +0.7 pts ▸ 0.7%
0.0% Islam +0.6 pts ▸ 0.6%
0.0% Buddhism +0.5 pts ▸ 0.5%
0.0% Judaism +0.2 pts ▸ 0.2%

Education & Qualifications

— 75.6% 95th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 69.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 71.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 75.6%
— 34.8% 89th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 32.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 32.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 34.8%
Schools ≤3 km in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +1 more in Mount Crosby
1 43rd pct 2 62nd pct
Avg size in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +520 larger in Mount Crosby
36 13th pct 556 79th pct
1,044 76th pct 1,045 76th pct

Highest year of school

38.5% Year 12 +37.1 pts ▸ 75.6%
53.8% Year 10 ◂ +39.9 pts 13.9%
23.1% Year 9 or below ◂ +19.7 pts 3.4%
0.0% Year 11 +5.2 pts ▸ 5.2%

Highest qualification level

36.4% Bachelor degree ◂ +5.1 pts 31.3%
36.4% Certificate III / IV ◂ +13.6 pts 22.8%
0.0% Advanced diploma / diploma +17.2 pts ▸ 17.2%
0.0% Postgraduate degree +13.7 pts ▸ 13.7%
0.0% Graduate diploma / certificate +5.6 pts ▸ 5.6%
0.0% Certificate I / II +1.4 pts ▸ 1.4%

Field of qualification

45.5% Health ◂ +33.8 pts 11.7%
36.4% Engineering & related ◂ +21.5 pts 14.8%
0.0% Management & commerce +19.1 pts ▸ 19.1%
0.0% Society & culture +11.0 pts ▸ 11.0%
0.0% Education +8.8 pts ▸ 8.8%
0.0% Natural & physical sciences +6.4 pts ▸ 6.4%
0.0% Architecture & building +5.7 pts ▸ 5.7%
0.0% Creative arts +5.7 pts ▸ 5.7%
0.0% Food, hospitality & personal services +4.2 pts ▸ 4.2%
0.0% Information technology +3.0 pts ▸ 3.0%
0.0% Agriculture & environment +2.8 pts ▸ 2.8%

Income

Personal income in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +$247 higher in Mount Crosby gap narrowing
$774 54th pct $1,021 84th pct
  • First area, 2016: $593
  • First area, 2021: $774
  • Second area, 2011: $870
  • Second area, 2016: $937
  • Second area, 2021: $1,021
Household income in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +$744 higher in Mount Crosby gap narrowing
$2,249 86th pct $2,993 96th pct
  • First area, 2016: $1,375
  • First area, 2021: $2,249
  • Second area, 2011: $2,085
  • Second area, 2016: $2,371
  • Second area, 2021: $2,993
Family income in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +$895 higher in Mount Crosby gap widening
$2,250 71st pct $3,145 92nd pct
  • First area, 2016: $1,999
  • First area, 2021: $2,250
  • Second area, 2011: $2,206
  • Second area, 2016: $2,583
  • Second area, 2021: $3,145
— 22.4% 92nd pct
  • Second area, 2011: 11.8%
  • Second area, 2016: 17.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 22.4%
— 46.8% 99th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 19.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 30.6%
  • Second area, 2021: 46.8%

Household income distribution

0.0% $4,000 or more +26.7 pts ▸ 26.7%
0.0% $1,500–$2,999 +24.3 pts ▸ 24.3%
0.0% $3,000–$3,999 +20.2 pts ▸ 20.2%
0.0% $650–$1,499 +16.2 pts ▸ 16.2%
0.0% Under $650 +5.8 pts ▸ 5.8%

Personal income distribution

16.7% Under $650 +19.1 pts ▸ 35.8%
27.8% $1,500–$2,999 +0.1 pts ▸ 27.9%
0.0% $650–$1,499 +25.4 pts ▸ 25.4%
0.0% $3,000 or more +8.3 pts ▸ 8.3%

Health & Disability

— 25.9% 35th pct
— 8.7% 56th pct
— 3.5% 37th pct
  • First area, 2016: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 2.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 2.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 3.5%

Long-term health conditions reported

17.6% Arthritis ◂ +10.3 pts 7.4%
17.6% Asthma ◂ +8.0 pts 9.7%
17.6% Stroke ◂ +17.2 pts 0.5%
0.0% Other condition +9.0 pts ▸ 9.0%
0.0% Mental health +8.7 pts ▸ 8.7%
0.0% Diabetes +2.8 pts ▸ 2.8%
0.0% Heart disease +2.4 pts ▸ 2.4%
0.0% Cancer +2.3 pts ▸ 2.3%
0.0% Lung condition +1.2 pts ▸ 1.2%
0.0% Dementia +0.2 pts ▸ 0.2%

Number of long-term health conditions

88.2% None ◂ +19.8 pts 68.4%
0.0% One condition +18.8 pts ▸ 18.8%
0.0% Two conditions +4.9 pts ▸ 4.9%
0.0% Three or more +2.3 pts ▸ 2.3%

Community Participation

— 16.9% 44th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 21.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 20.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 16.9%
— 14.2% 66th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 10.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 11.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 14.2%
— 31.7% 79th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 40.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 35.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 31.7%
— 5.6% 86th pct
— 27.1% 66th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 29.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 25.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 27.1%

First Nations

First Nations people in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +24 larger in Mount Crosby
0 0th pct 24 71st pct
— 20 yrs 25th pct
— $524 36th pct
— $2,874 87th pct
Indigenous language in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby
— 0.0% 0th pct

Family & Households

Household size in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +0.1 larger in Lake Manchester gap narrowing
3.2 89th pct 3.1 88th pct
  • First area, 2016: 4.0
  • First area, 2021: 3.2
  • Second area, 2011: 3.0
  • Second area, 2016: 3.1
  • Second area, 2021: 3.1
One-parent in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +6.7 pts higher in Mount Crosby
0.0% 0th pct 6.7% 27th pct
  • First area, 2021: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 9.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 5.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 6.7%
— 11.8% 11th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 9.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 11.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 11.8%

Family composition

66.7% Couples with children +6.4 pts ▸ 73.1%
0.0% Couples without children +19.5 pts ▸ 19.5%
0.0% One-parent families +6.7 pts ▸ 6.7%
0.0% Other families +0.5 pts ▸ 0.5%

Household size

60.0% 4 people ◂ +35.0 pts 25.0%
0.0% 2 people +30.3 pts ▸ 30.3%
0.0% 3 people +17.3 pts ▸ 17.3%
0.0% 1 person +11.8 pts ▸ 11.8%
0.0% 5 people +11.1 pts ▸ 11.1%
0.0% 6 or more +5.1 pts ▸ 5.1%

Housing & Dwellings

— $478 90th pct
  • Second area, 2011: $370
  • Second area, 2016: $420
  • Second area, 2021: $478
Mortgage in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +$1,045 higher in Mount Crosby
$1,050 17th pct $2,095 76th pct
  • First area, 2021: $1,050
  • Second area, 2011: $2,000
  • Second area, 2016: $2,112
  • Second area, 2021: $2,095
People / bedroom in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +0.20 higher in Lake Manchester gap narrowing
1.00 89th pct 0.80 43rd pct
  • First area, 2016: 1.30
  • First area, 2021: 1.00
  • Second area, 2011: 1.10
  • Second area, 2016: 0.80
  • Second area, 2021: 0.80
— 6.8% 16th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 8.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 8.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 6.8%
— 30.4% 23rd pct
  • Second area, 2011: 24.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 24.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 30.4%
— 100.0% 100th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 100.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 99.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 100.0%
— 95.7% 91st pct
  • Second area, 2011: 93.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 92.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 95.7%

How homes are owned or rented

80.0% Owned outright ◂ +49.6 pts 30.4%
80.0% Owned with a mortgage ◂ +18.3 pts 61.7%
0.0% Rented +6.8 pts ▸ 6.8%
0.0% Not stated +0.5 pts ▸ 0.5%
0.0% Other tenure even 0.0%

Types of homes

100.0% Separate house +0.5 pts ▸ 100.5%
0.0% Other dwelling +0.5 pts ▸ 0.5%
0.0% Townhouse / semi-detached even 0.0%
0.0% Flat or apartment even 0.0%

Bedrooms per home

100.0% 3 bedrooms ◂ +74.4 pts 25.6%
80.0% 2 bedrooms ◂ +76.4 pts 3.6%
0.0% 4 bedrooms +51.1 pts ▸ 51.1%
0.0% 5 or more +19.0 pts ▸ 19.0%
0.0% 1 bedroom +0.9 pts ▸ 0.9%
0.0% Studio / none even 0.0%

Monthly mortgage distribution

0.0% $1,800–$2,999 +43.2 pts ▸ 43.2%
0.0% $1,000–$1,799 +25.2 pts ▸ 25.2%
0.0% $3,000 or more +13.3 pts ▸ 13.3%
0.0% Under $1,000 +11.9 pts ▸ 11.9%

Transport & Vehicles

— 0.5% 46th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 0.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 0.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 0.5%
— 23.7% 69th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 8.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 7.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 23.7%
— 1.6% 77th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 2.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 1.6%
  • Second area, 2021: 1.6%
0 0th pct 0 0th pct
0.00 0th pct 0.00 0th pct
0.0 0th pct 0.0 0th pct
0 0th pct 0 0th pct
Drive to city in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +176 longer in Lake Manchester
204 100th pct 28 24th pct
Reach 30 min in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +6,032 more in Mount Crosby
0 0th pct 6,032 52nd pct
Reach 45 min in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +6,032 more in Mount Crosby
0 0th pct 6,032 36th pct

How people get to work

100.0% Car (driver) ◂ +44.7 pts 55.3%
0.0% Worked at home +23.7 pts ▸ 23.7%
0.0% Car (passenger) +3.6 pts ▸ 3.6%
0.0% Bus +0.9 pts ▸ 0.9%
0.0% Train +0.8 pts ▸ 0.8%
0.0% Walked +0.7 pts ▸ 0.7%
0.0% Bicycle even 0.0%

Motor vehicles per home

160.0% 2 vehicles ◂ +116.1 pts 43.9%
0.0% 3 vehicles +25.3 pts ▸ 25.3%
0.0% 1 vehicle +15.2 pts ▸ 15.2%
0.0% 4 or more +14.5 pts ▸ 14.5%
0.0% No vehicle +0.5 pts ▸ 0.5%

Migration & Movement

— 26.2% 32nd pct
  • First area, 2016: 45.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 35.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 33.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 26.2%
— 2.0% 32nd pct
  • Second area, 2011: 5.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 6.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 2.0%

Jobs & Industry

— 3.4% 48th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 4.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 4.6%
  • Second area, 2021: 3.4%
— 73.2% 87th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 76.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 72.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 73.2%
— 58.6% 52nd pct
  • Second area, 2011: 65.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 63.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 58.6%

Industries people work in

55.6% Construction ◂ +46.5 pts 9.0%
44.4% Health care & social assistance ◂ +27.9 pts 16.5%
0.0% Education & training +12.4 pts ▸ 12.4%
0.0% Professional & technical +11.1 pts ▸ 11.1%
0.0% Retail trade +8.7 pts ▸ 8.7%
0.0% Public administration & safety +6.7 pts ▸ 6.7%
0.0% Accommodation & food +4.8 pts ▸ 4.8%
0.0% Manufacturing +4.5 pts ▸ 4.5%
0.0% Other services +3.6 pts ▸ 3.6%
0.0% Finance & insurance +3.3 pts ▸ 3.3%
0.0% Wholesale trade +2.9 pts ▸ 2.9%
0.0% Administrative & support +2.9 pts ▸ 2.9%

Occupations people work in

44.4% Technicians & trades ◂ +31.5 pts 13.0%
33.3% Professionals ◂ +3.8 pts 29.5%
0.0% Managers +16.2 pts ▸ 16.2%
0.0% Clerical & administrative +13.3 pts ▸ 13.3%
0.0% Community & personal service +11.1 pts ▸ 11.1%
0.0% Sales workers +7.8 pts ▸ 7.8%
0.0% Labourers +5.1 pts ▸ 5.1%
0.0% Machinery operators & drivers +3.6 pts ▸ 3.6%

Walkability

Walk score in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +0.4 higher in Mount Crosby
0.3 46th pct 0.6 54th pct
Types ≤15 min in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +0.4 more in Mount Crosby
0.3 47th pct 0.7 57th pct
15-min city in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +10.8 pts higher in Mount Crosby
0.0% 0th pct 10.8% 66th pct
Walk to shops in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +11.0 pts higher in Mount Crosby
0.0% 0th pct 11.0% 65th pct
Walk to transit in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby even
0.0% 0th pct 0.0% 0th pct
Walk to school in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +12.4 pts higher in Mount Crosby
0.0% 0th pct 12.4% 62nd pct
Walk to a park in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +15.4 pts higher in Lake Manchester
30.2% 58th pct 14.9% 50th pct
Walk to health in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby even
0.0% 0th pct 0.0% 0th pct
Amenities/1k in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +459.8 more in Lake Manchester
470.6 100th pct 10.8 43rd pct
Intersections/km² in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +11 higher in Mount Crosby
1 48th pct 12 72nd pct
Mean slope in Lake Manchesterin Mount Crosby +6.6 pts higher in Lake Manchester
17.4% 96th pct 10.8% 84th pct

Compare Lake Manchester with nearby areas

Compare Mount Crosby with nearby areas

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lake Manchester vs Mount Crosby [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31616/lake-manchester/vs/SAL31953/mount-crosby