Compare
Lake Manchester vs Mount Crosby
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.2 km apart · Lake Manchester profile · Mount Crosby profile
Lake Manchester Mount Crosby
Mount Crosby and Lake Manchester are neighbouring areas in Queensland with very different levels of activity. Mount Crosby is the more established of the two, with a population of 1,860 and a typical weekly household income of $2,993, which is far above the national figure. In contrast, Lake Manchester is sparsely populated with only 17 residents. The two differ sharply in accessibility; Mount Crosby has a 28-minute drive time to the city, while the trip from Lake Manchester takes 204 minutes. This is reflected in the cost of housing, as the typical monthly home loan payment in Mount Crosby is $2,095, far higher than the $1,050 seen in Lake Manchester.
Both areas are essentially car-dependent, as neither has any homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport. They also share a similar typical resident age, with Mount Crosby at 42 and Lake Manchester slightly older at 44. While Mount Crosby has more street connectivity and a larger number of schools, both areas are mostly made up of couples with children.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 23
- First area, 2021: 17
- Second area, 2011: 1,728
- Second area, 2016: 1,832
- Second area, 2021: 1,860
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Crosby: 0.6% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Crosby: 0.5% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Crosby: 1.2% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 66.7% females; 70–74 in Mount Crosby: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Mount Crosby: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Mount Crosby: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Mount Crosby: 4.8% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Mount Crosby: 4.7% males, 6.0% females
- 45–49 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Mount Crosby: 5.2% males, 4.4% females
- 40–44 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Mount Crosby: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 35–39 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Crosby: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Mount Crosby: 1.1% males, 1.7% females
- 25–29 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Crosby: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 20–24 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Crosby: 2.2% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Crosby: 5.1% males, 4.8% females
- 10–14 in Lake Manchester: 33.3% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Mount Crosby: 5.3% males, 4.7% females
- 5–9 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Mount Crosby: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Lake Manchester: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Crosby: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $593
- First area, 2021: $774
- Second area, 2011: $870
- Second area, 2016: $937
- Second area, 2021: $1,021
- First area, 2016: $1,375
- First area, 2021: $2,249
- Second area, 2011: $2,085
- Second area, 2016: $2,371
- Second area, 2021: $2,993
- First area, 2016: $1,999
- First area, 2021: $2,250
- Second area, 2011: $2,206
- Second area, 2016: $2,583
- Second area, 2021: $3,145
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 4.0
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2011: $370
- Second area, 2016: $420
- Second area, 2021: $478
- First area, 2021: $1,050
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,112
- Second area, 2021: $2,095
- First area, 2016: 1.30
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Lake Manchester with nearby areas
Compare Mount Crosby with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lake Manchester vs Mount Crosby [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31616/lake-manchester/vs/SAL31953/mount-crosby