Compare
Gracemere vs Port Curtis
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Gracemere profile · Port Curtis profile
Gracemere Port Curtis
Gracemere and Port Curtis are two nearby areas in Queensland with very different profiles. Gracemere is a larger, younger hub where the typical resident is 32, compared to 41 in Port Curtis. It has a strong focus on families, with 26.1% of people under 15 and a high 34.8% of people providing unpaid childcare. This is reflected in the housing, where 92.9% of homes have three or more bedrooms and 39.3% are rented. In contrast, Port Curtis is sparsely populated and has a much higher share of people living alone (39.3%) and homes owned outright (34.6%).
Daily life in both places shares some common threads, as both have almost no residents who speak little or no English and very similar rates of people who served in the Defence Force. While they share these traits, they are moving in different directions regarding stability; Gracemere has seen a high number of new arrivals, with 45.7% of people moving in during the last five years. Port Curtis remains more static, with only 31.3% of residents arriving in that timeframe.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 8,401
- First area, 2016: 11,315
- First area, 2021: 12,023
- Second area, 2011: 327
- Second area, 2016: 281
- Second area, 2021: 309
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gracemere: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Port Curtis: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Gracemere: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Port Curtis: 1.3% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Gracemere: 1.0% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Port Curtis: 4.3% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Gracemere: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Port Curtis: 1.3% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Gracemere: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Port Curtis: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Gracemere: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Port Curtis: 6.4% males, 1.0% females
- 55–59 in Gracemere: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 55–59 in Port Curtis: 6.0% males, 5.4% females
- 50–54 in Gracemere: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Port Curtis: 2.0% males, 5.0% females
- 45–49 in Gracemere: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Port Curtis: 3.3% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Gracemere: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Port Curtis: 1.3% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Gracemere: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Port Curtis: 3.0% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Gracemere: 3.3% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Port Curtis: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Gracemere: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Port Curtis: 1.0% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Gracemere: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Port Curtis: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Gracemere: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Port Curtis: 2.7% males, 1.7% females
- 10–14 in Gracemere: 4.4% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Port Curtis: 1.0% males, 4.3% females
- 5–9 in Gracemere: 4.4% males, 4.6% females; 5–9 in Port Curtis: 3.0% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Gracemere: 4.4% males, 3.8% females; 0–4 in Port Curtis: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $665
- First area, 2016: $676
- First area, 2021: $778
- Second area, 2011: $440
- Second area, 2016: $536
- Second area, 2021: $695
- First area, 2011: $1,494
- First area, 2016: $1,430
- First area, 2021: $1,711
- Second area, 2011: $991
- Second area, 2016: $1,113
- Second area, 2021: $1,156
- First area, 2011: $1,593
- First area, 2016: $1,533
- First area, 2021: $1,847
- Second area, 2011: $1,204
- Second area, 2016: $1,333
- Second area, 2021: $1,687
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2011: $220
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,043
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Gracemere with nearby areas
Compare Port Curtis with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gracemere vs Port Curtis [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31219/gracemere/vs/SAL32351/port-curtis