Compare
Earlville vs White Rock
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.5 km apart · Earlville profile · White Rock profile
Earlville White Rock
White Rock (Cairns - Qld) and Earlville are neighbouring areas with distinct characters. White Rock is a younger community where the typical resident is 37, and it has a much higher share of larger homes, with 80.2% having three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Earlville is older, with a typical age of 44, and is far more walkable; it is described as very walkable, whereas White Rock is mostly car-dependent. This difference is clear in the local amenities, as 84.7% of Earlville homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to just 11.6% in White Rock (Cairns - Qld).
Daily life in both places shares many similarities, including typical weekly personal incomes of around $700 and nearly identical rates of public transport use for commuting. While they share these basics, other gaps remain. White Rock (Cairns - Qld) has a well higher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 18.5%, while Earlville has a well higher share of people born overseas at 21.8%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,853
- First area, 2016: 4,030
- First area, 2021: 4,200
- Second area, 2011: 4,490
- Second area, 2016: 4,730
- Second area, 2021: 4,918
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Earlville: 1.6% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in White Rock: 0.6% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Earlville: 1.4% males, 2.4% females; 80–84 in White Rock: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Earlville: 2.0% males, 3.0% females; 75–79 in White Rock: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Earlville: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in White Rock: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 65–69 in Earlville: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in White Rock: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Earlville: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in White Rock: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Earlville: 3.7% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in White Rock: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Earlville: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in White Rock: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Earlville: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in White Rock: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Earlville: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in White Rock: 2.9% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Earlville: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in White Rock: 3.0% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Earlville: 3.1% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in White Rock: 3.4% males, 3.8% females
- 25–29 in Earlville: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in White Rock: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Earlville: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in White Rock: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Earlville: 3.2% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in White Rock: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Earlville: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in White Rock: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Earlville: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in White Rock: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 0–4 in Earlville: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in White Rock: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $549
- First area, 2016: $594
- First area, 2021: $700
- Second area, 2011: $558
- Second area, 2016: $627
- Second area, 2021: $694
- First area, 2011: $909
- First area, 2016: $958
- First area, 2021: $1,166
- Second area, 2011: $1,062
- Second area, 2016: $1,234
- Second area, 2021: $1,396
- First area, 2011: $1,251
- First area, 2016: $1,385
- First area, 2021: $1,763
- Second area, 2011: $1,188
- Second area, 2016: $1,392
- Second area, 2021: $1,588
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $210
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $290
- Second area, 2011: $270
- Second area, 2016: $310
- Second area, 2021: $340
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,408
- Second area, 2021: $1,343
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Earlville with nearby areas
Compare White Rock with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Earlville vs White Rock [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30917/earlville/vs/SAL33062/white-rock