Compare
Earlville vs Mount Sheridan
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.6 km apart · Earlville profile · Mount Sheridan profile
Earlville Mount Sheridan
Mount Sheridan (Qld) and Earlville are neighbouring areas with very different housing and household profiles. Mount Sheridan (Qld) is dominated by large family homes, with 95% having three or more bedrooms and 98.7% being separate houses. It has a younger population and more working adults, with a typical weekly household income of $1,826. In contrast, Earlville has far more people living alone (37.4%) and a much older population, where 24% are aged 65 and over. Earlville also has more residents without a car and a lower typical weekly income of $1,166.
These two areas share a similar proportion of overseas-born residents and very similar home ownership and mortgage rates. However, the gap in walkability is striking, with 83.7% of Earlville homes within a 15-minute walk of a school or health services, compared to just 46.7% and 34.1% in Mount Sheridan (Qld). While Earlville is more walkable, Mount Sheridan (Qld) has more people working or looking for work, a gap that remains significant between these two neighbours.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,853
- First area, 2016: 4,030
- First area, 2021: 4,200
- Second area, 2011: 7,994
- Second area, 2016: 8,271
- Second area, 2021: 8,678
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Earlville: 1.6% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in Mount Sheridan: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Earlville: 1.4% males, 2.4% females; 80–84 in Mount Sheridan: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Earlville: 2.0% males, 3.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Sheridan: 1.0% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Earlville: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Mount Sheridan: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Earlville: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Mount Sheridan: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Earlville: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Mount Sheridan: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Earlville: 3.7% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Mount Sheridan: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Earlville: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Mount Sheridan: 3.5% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Earlville: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Mount Sheridan: 3.4% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Earlville: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Mount Sheridan: 2.9% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Earlville: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Sheridan: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Earlville: 3.1% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Mount Sheridan: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Earlville: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Mount Sheridan: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Earlville: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Mount Sheridan: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Earlville: 3.2% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Mount Sheridan: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Earlville: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Mount Sheridan: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Earlville: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Mount Sheridan: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Earlville: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Mount Sheridan: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $549
- First area, 2016: $594
- First area, 2021: $700
- Second area, 2011: $681
- Second area, 2016: $742
- Second area, 2021: $857
- First area, 2011: $909
- First area, 2016: $958
- First area, 2021: $1,166
- Second area, 2011: $1,432
- Second area, 2016: $1,554
- Second area, 2021: $1,826
- First area, 2011: $1,251
- First area, 2016: $1,385
- First area, 2021: $1,763
- Second area, 2011: $1,563
- Second area, 2016: $1,705
- Second area, 2021: $2,018
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $210
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $290
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,777
- Second area, 2016: $1,647
- Second area, 2021: $1,542
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Earlville with nearby areas
Compare Mount Sheridan with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Earlville vs Mount Sheridan [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30917/earlville/vs/SAL32020/mount-sheridan