Compare
Dayboro vs Laceys Creek
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Dayboro profile · Laceys Creek profile
Dayboro Laceys Creek
Dayboro and Laceys Creek are nearby areas in Queensland with very different levels of accessibility. Dayboro is more developed, with a mostly car-dependent walkability score and 59.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, health services, and schools. In contrast, Laceys Creek is car-dependent, with 0.0% of homes within a 15-minute walk of those same services. Dayboro also has more large homes, with 91.8% having three or more bedrooms compared to 75.0% in Laceys Creek, and a much higher share of people who moved there in the last five years (41.1% versus 25.7%).
These two areas are almost identical in the typical weekly personal income of their residents, which sits just under $1,000 in both places. They also share similar rates of volunteering and a nearly equal share of people born overseas. While they track together on income, other gaps remain; for example, the typical resident in Laceys Creek is noticeably older at 45, compared to 40 in Dayboro.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,692
- First area, 2016: 2,119
- First area, 2021: 2,376
- Second area, 2011: 245
- Second area, 2016: 278
- Second area, 2021: 280
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Dayboro: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Laceys Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Dayboro: 0.6% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Laceys Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Dayboro: 1.4% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Laceys Creek: 1.1% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Dayboro: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Laceys Creek: 1.1% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Dayboro: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Laceys Creek: 2.6% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Dayboro: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 60–64 in Laceys Creek: 3.8% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Dayboro: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Laceys Creek: 3.8% males, 5.6% females
- 50–54 in Dayboro: 3.9% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Laceys Creek: 7.1% males, 5.3% females
- 45–49 in Dayboro: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Laceys Creek: 4.5% males, 8.6% females
- 40–44 in Dayboro: 3.7% males, 4.5% females; 40–44 in Laceys Creek: 2.3% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Dayboro: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Laceys Creek: 3.4% males, 2.3% females
- 30–34 in Dayboro: 2.6% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Laceys Creek: 2.6% males, 4.1% females
- 25–29 in Dayboro: 1.9% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Laceys Creek: 1.9% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Dayboro: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Laceys Creek: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 15–19 in Dayboro: 2.9% males, 3.6% females; 15–19 in Laceys Creek: 3.8% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Dayboro: 3.7% males, 5.0% females; 10–14 in Laceys Creek: 3.8% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Dayboro: 4.2% males, 4.5% females; 5–9 in Laceys Creek: 1.1% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Dayboro: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Laceys Creek: 3.0% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $597
- First area, 2016: $733
- First area, 2021: $933
- Second area, 2011: $654
- Second area, 2016: $697
- Second area, 2021: $968
- First area, 2011: $1,468
- First area, 2016: $1,875
- First area, 2021: $2,303
- Second area, 2011: $1,874
- Second area, 2016: $1,937
- Second area, 2021: $2,523
- First area, 2011: $1,663
- First area, 2016: $2,027
- First area, 2021: $2,504
- Second area, 2011: $1,843
- Second area, 2016: $2,250
- Second area, 2021: $2,675
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $353
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $162
- Second area, 2016: $275
- Second area, 2021: $295
- First area, 2011: $2,100
- First area, 2016: $2,134
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,900
- Second area, 2016: $2,017
- Second area, 2021: $2,145
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Dayboro with nearby areas
Compare Laceys Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Dayboro vs Laceys Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30816/dayboro/vs/SAL31602/laceys-creek