Compare
Conondale vs Kidaman Creek
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 13 km apart · Conondale profile · Kidaman Creek profile
Conondale Kidaman Creek
Conondale and Kidaman Creek are nearby rural areas in Queensland. Conondale has a larger population of 882 people, while Kidaman Creek is sparsely populated with 125 residents. There are significant differences in their demographics; Conondale has far more people with no religion (58.8% compared to 44.8%) and more people who finished Year 12 (55.5% versus 39.4%). In Kidaman Creek, the typical family income is well higher at $1,874 per week, compared to $1,464 in Conondale. First Nations residents in Kidaman Creek are also far older, with a typical age of 74 compared to 25 in Conondale.
Both areas are car-dependent and share a very similar drive time to the city, taking around 97 to 99 minutes. They are also alike in that no one uses public transport to commute. While both places are largely rural, Conondale has slightly more infrastructure, including a school within 3 km and more homes within walking distance of a park. These gaps in accessibility and education are set against a backdrop of similar health profiles, with both areas reporting nearly identical rates of long-term health conditions.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 799
- First area, 2016: 858
- First area, 2021: 882
- Second area, 2016: 130
- Second area, 2021: 125
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 51 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Conondale: 0.0% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Kidaman Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Conondale: 1.4% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Kidaman Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Conondale: 2.5% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Kidaman Creek: 2.4% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Conondale: 4.0% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Kidaman Creek: 4.8% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Conondale: 4.6% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Kidaman Creek: 6.3% males, 10.3% females
- 60–64 in Conondale: 4.8% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Kidaman Creek: 7.9% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Conondale: 3.3% males, 5.2% females; 55–59 in Kidaman Creek: 4.0% males, 4.8% females
- 50–54 in Conondale: 4.6% males, 4.3% females; 50–54 in Kidaman Creek: 5.6% males, 7.9% females
- 45–49 in Conondale: 3.7% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Kidaman Creek: 3.2% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Conondale: 2.1% males, 5.0% females; 40–44 in Kidaman Creek: 0.0% males, 6.3% females
- 35–39 in Conondale: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Kidaman Creek: 3.2% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Conondale: 1.2% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Kidaman Creek: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 25–29 in Conondale: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Kidaman Creek: 4.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Conondale: 2.4% males, 1.2% females; 20–24 in Kidaman Creek: 3.2% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Conondale: 3.5% males, 1.7% females; 15–19 in Kidaman Creek: 2.4% males, 6.3% females
- 10–14 in Conondale: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Kidaman Creek: 4.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Conondale: 2.8% males, 1.8% females; 5–9 in Kidaman Creek: 2.4% males, 4.0% females
- 0–4 in Conondale: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Kidaman Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $393
- First area, 2016: $473
- First area, 2021: $583
- Second area, 2016: $589
- Second area, 2021: $640
- First area, 2011: $730
- First area, 2016: $853
- First area, 2021: $1,194
- Second area, 2016: $1,041
- Second area, 2021: $1,025
- First area, 2011: $794
- First area, 2016: $976
- First area, 2021: $1,464
- Second area, 2016: $1,458
- Second area, 2021: $1,874
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $233
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $144
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,232
- First area, 2021: $1,340
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Conondale with nearby areas
Compare Kidaman Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Conondale vs Kidaman Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30666/conondale/vs/SAL31524/kidaman-creek