Compare
Cedar Pocket vs Tandur
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.5 km apart · Cedar Pocket profile · Tandur profile
Cedar Pocket Tandur
Cedar Pocket and Tandur are neighbouring areas in Queensland. Cedar Pocket is a notably older community where the typical resident is 53, compared with 45 in Tandur. This age difference is reflected in health and housing, with people with long-term health conditions far more common in Cedar Pocket (31.0% versus 17.6%) and homes owned outright far more frequent (59.5% versus 28.6%). Tandur has a younger First Nations population and much higher typical personal incomes for First Nations people, with a gap of $900 per week.
These two areas share a similar housing style, with both consisting entirely of detached houses. They also have nearly identical typical weekly rents and a similar proportion of volunteers. While they are alike in many ways, a few gaps are widening. For example, the difference in home ownership has grown, and Cedar Pocket has seen a continuing increase in the share of residents aged 65 and over compared to Tandur.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 420
- First area, 2016: 339
- First area, 2021: 332
- Second area, 2011: 236
- Second area, 2016: 186
- Second area, 2021: 188
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cedar Pocket: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Tandur: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Cedar Pocket: 0.9% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Tandur: 0.0% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Cedar Pocket: 2.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Tandur: 3.0% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Cedar Pocket: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 70–74 in Tandur: 2.0% males, 1.5% females
- 65–69 in Cedar Pocket: 4.4% males, 5.7% females; 65–69 in Tandur: 4.0% males, 5.1% females
- 60–64 in Cedar Pocket: 8.9% males, 5.7% females; 60–64 in Tandur: 2.0% males, 5.6% females
- 55–59 in Cedar Pocket: 3.8% males, 7.3% females; 55–59 in Tandur: 5.1% males, 4.5% females
- 50–54 in Cedar Pocket: 5.7% males, 2.5% females; 50–54 in Tandur: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Cedar Pocket: 3.8% males, 4.4% females; 45–49 in Tandur: 4.5% males, 2.0% females
- 40–44 in Cedar Pocket: 1.6% males, 1.3% females; 40–44 in Tandur: 4.5% males, 4.5% females
- 35–39 in Cedar Pocket: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 35–39 in Tandur: 5.1% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Cedar Pocket: 1.3% males, 2.2% females; 30–34 in Tandur: 0.0% males, 4.0% females
- 25–29 in Cedar Pocket: 0.0% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Tandur: 2.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Cedar Pocket: 0.0% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Tandur: 2.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Cedar Pocket: 2.8% males, 4.1% females; 15–19 in Tandur: 4.5% males, 5.1% females
- 10–14 in Cedar Pocket: 1.6% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Tandur: 3.0% males, 5.1% females
- 5–9 in Cedar Pocket: 1.6% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Tandur: 2.0% males, 4.5% females
- 0–4 in Cedar Pocket: 1.6% males, 1.3% females; 0–4 in Tandur: 0.0% males, 1.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $423
- First area, 2016: $467
- First area, 2021: $590
- Second area, 2011: $365
- Second area, 2016: $535
- Second area, 2021: $566
- First area, 2011: $794
- First area, 2016: $1,111
- First area, 2021: $1,468
- Second area, 2011: $863
- Second area, 2016: $1,202
- Second area, 2021: $1,781
- First area, 2011: $909
- First area, 2016: $1,112
- First area, 2021: $1,638
- Second area, 2011: $1,075
- Second area, 2016: $1,518
- Second area, 2021: $1,949
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $240
- First area, 2016: $290
- First area, 2021: $338
- Second area, 2011: $225
- Second area, 2021: $330
- First area, 2011: $1,500
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,365
- Second area, 2011: $1,534
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cedar Pocket with nearby areas
Compare Tandur with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cedar Pocket vs Tandur [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30570/cedar-pocket/vs/SAL32740/tandur