Compare
Calgoa vs Mudlo
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Calgoa profile · Mudlo profile
Calgoa Mudlo
Calgoa and Mudlo are both sparsely populated areas in Queensland. Residents in Calgoa are far older, with a typical age of 55 compared to 40 in Mudlo. While typical weekly personal income is far higher in Mudlo at $762 compared to $425 in Calgoa, the opposite is true for households. Typical weekly household income in Calgoa is $2,250, which is well higher than the $1,649 seen in Mudlo.
Both areas are car-dependent and lack basic walkable amenities, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of a school, park, or grocery store. This shared isolation is consistent across both places, and they each have a walkability score of 0.0 (car-dependent). In Mudlo, homes are larger, with a typical 3.0 people per home compared to 2.2 in Calgoa.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 9
- First area, 2021: 14
- Second area, 2016: 7
- Second area, 2021: 3
Age structure
Marital status
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $754
- First area, 2021: $425
- Second area, 2021: $762
- First area, 2016: $1,437
- First area, 2021: $2,250
- Second area, 2021: $1,649
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
First Nations
Family & Households
Family composition
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Calgoa with nearby areas
Compare Mudlo with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Calgoa vs Mudlo [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30485/calgoa/vs/SAL32052/mudlo