Compare
Bullcamp vs Nanango
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 13 km apart · Bullcamp profile · Nanango profile
Bullcamp Nanango
Nanango is a larger residential hub, while Bullcamp is sparsely populated. A major contrast is the local environment; Nanango is mostly car-dependent but has a walkability score of 3.1, with 69.8% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park. Bullcamp is completely car-dependent, with no amenities within a 15-minute walk. Bullcamp also has a much higher share of people working from home (39.1% compared to 6.1% in Nanango) and a far higher rate of full-time employment (78.3% versus 52.7%).
These two nearby areas have tracked similarly since 2011 in several ways, as they now share very similar typical weekly personal incomes of around $472 to $474. Both places also have typical monthly home-loan payments of $1,000. They remain alike in the share of people in de facto relationships and the fact that neither area has any public transport stops. However, Bullcamp remains noticeably older, with a typical resident aged 59 and 37.9% of people aged 65 and over.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 55
- First area, 2021: 58
- Second area, 2011: 3,795
- Second area, 2016: 3,599
- Second area, 2021: 3,679
- First area, 2016: 60 yrs
- First area, 2021: 59 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 53 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Nanango: 1.0% males, 2.1% females
- 80–84 in Bullcamp: 10.3% males, 10.3% females; 80–84 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Nanango: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 70–74 in Bullcamp: 7.7% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Nanango: 4.8% males, 4.9% females
- 65–69 in Bullcamp: 10.3% males, 7.7% females; 65–69 in Nanango: 4.7% males, 4.7% females
- 60–64 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Nanango: 3.5% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 7.7% females; 55–59 in Nanango: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Bullcamp: 12.8% males, 7.7% females; 50–54 in Nanango: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Bullcamp: 7.7% males, 17.9% females; 45–49 in Nanango: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 30–34 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Nanango: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 25–29 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Nanango: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Nanango: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 0–4 in Bullcamp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $383
- First area, 2021: $474
- Second area, 2011: $367
- Second area, 2016: $445
- Second area, 2021: $472
- First area, 2016: $784
- First area, 2021: $1,125
- Second area, 2011: $691
- Second area, 2016: $780
- Second area, 2021: $865
- First area, 2016: $833
- First area, 2021: $1,156
- Second area, 2011: $820
- Second area, 2016: $962
- Second area, 2021: $1,143
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2011: $185
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $220
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,157
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,000
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bullcamp with nearby areas
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bullcamp vs Nanango [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30413/bullcamp/vs/SAL32100/nanango