Compare
Belmunda vs Mount Jukes
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.2 km apart · Belmunda profile · Mount Jukes profile
Belmunda Mount Jukes
Mount Jukes and Belmunda are neighbouring areas in Queensland, but they differ sharply in scale and demographics. Mount Jukes has a larger population of 373 and more people per home, with a typical household earning $2,187 a week. In contrast, Belmunda is largely non-residential with only 6 people. Residents there are far older, with a typical age of 60 compared to 45 in Mount Jukes, and the typical household income is much lower at $1,375.
Everyday life in both places is car-dependent, as neither has a walkable neighborhood or any homes within a short stroll of groceries, health services, or public transport. They also share a similar landscape with a roughly 10% terrain slope and almost identical typical monthly home-loan payments of around $1,733. While Belmunda has more parks within walking distance of its few homes, both areas remain isolated from basic amenities.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 7
- First area, 2021: 6
- Second area, 2011: 358
- Second area, 2016: 394
- Second area, 2021: 373
- First area, 2016: 52 yrs
- First area, 2021: 60 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Jukes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Jukes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Jukes: 0.0% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Mount Jukes: 2.1% males, 1.1% females
- 65–69 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Mount Jukes: 4.0% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 100.0% females; 60–64 in Mount Jukes: 4.5% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Mount Jukes: 4.8% males, 5.1% females
- 50–54 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Mount Jukes: 5.9% males, 5.3% females
- 45–49 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Mount Jukes: 4.3% males, 5.1% females
- 40–44 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Mount Jukes: 3.7% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Jukes: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Mount Jukes: 0.0% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Jukes: 1.9% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Jukes: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Jukes: 2.7% males, 4.5% females
- 10–14 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Mount Jukes: 4.0% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Mount Jukes: 2.4% males, 4.0% females
- 0–4 in Belmunda: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Jukes: 1.3% males, 3.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Income
- First area, 2016: $1,291
- First area, 2021: $874
- Second area, 2011: $702
- Second area, 2016: $549
- Second area, 2021: $760
- First area, 2021: $1,375
- Second area, 2011: $1,524
- Second area, 2016: $1,357
- Second area, 2021: $2,187
- First area, 2021: $1,375
- Second area, 2011: $1,708
- Second area, 2016: $1,781
- Second area, 2021: $2,457
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 1.0
- First area, 2021: 1.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $1,734
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $2,275
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Belmunda with nearby areas
Compare Mount Jukes with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Belmunda vs Mount Jukes [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30225/belmunda/vs/SAL31976/mount-jukes