Compare
Park Orchards vs Ringwood North
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.6 km apart · Park Orchards profile · Ringwood North profile
Park Orchards Ringwood North
Ringwood North and Park Orchards are neighbouring suburbs with different layouts and income levels. Ringwood North is much more connected, with 98.3% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport and 97% within 15 minutes of a school. Park Orchards is wealthier, with a typical household income of $3,155 a week compared to $2,335 in Ringwood North, and a much higher share of families earning $3,000 or more per week (47.3% versus 35.3%).
While the two areas share similar proportions of children and people working from home, the gap in accessibility is widening. Ringwood North has far higher street connectivity and more homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while Park Orchards remains more car-dependent. This contrast is mirrored in their housing, where Park Orchards has a higher share of homes owned outright and more large houses with five or more bedrooms.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,718
- First area, 2016: 3,822
- First area, 2021: 3,835
- Second area, 2011: 9,657
- Second area, 2016: 9,832
- Second area, 2021: 9,964
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Park Orchards: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Ringwood North: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Park Orchards: 1.0% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Ringwood North: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Park Orchards: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Ringwood North: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Park Orchards: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Ringwood North: 2.3% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Park Orchards: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Ringwood North: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Park Orchards: 3.9% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Ringwood North: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Park Orchards: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Ringwood North: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Park Orchards: 5.1% males, 5.5% females; 50–54 in Ringwood North: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Park Orchards: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 45–49 in Ringwood North: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Park Orchards: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Ringwood North: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Park Orchards: 1.4% males, 1.9% females; 35–39 in Ringwood North: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Park Orchards: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 30–34 in Ringwood North: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Park Orchards: 1.8% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Ringwood North: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Park Orchards: 4.1% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Ringwood North: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Park Orchards: 5.6% males, 4.3% females; 15–19 in Ringwood North: 3.8% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Park Orchards: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Ringwood North: 3.9% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Park Orchards: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Ringwood North: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Park Orchards: 1.5% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Ringwood North: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $720
- First area, 2016: $788
- First area, 2021: $958
- Second area, 2011: $662
- Second area, 2016: $737
- Second area, 2021: $882
- First area, 2011: $2,329
- First area, 2016: $2,660
- First area, 2021: $3,155
- Second area, 2011: $1,690
- Second area, 2016: $1,923
- Second area, 2021: $2,335
- First area, 2011: $2,437
- First area, 2016: $2,873
- First area, 2021: $3,464
- Second area, 2011: $1,919
- Second area, 2016: $2,168
- Second area, 2021: $2,640
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.3
- First area, 2016: 3.3
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $455
- First area, 2016: $423
- First area, 2021: $601
- Second area, 2011: $321
- Second area, 2016: $381
- Second area, 2021: $436
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,400
- First area, 2021: $3,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,200
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Park Orchards with nearby areas
Compare Ringwood North with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Park Orchards vs Ringwood North [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL22036/park-orchards/vs/SAL22176/ringwood-north