Compare
Montrose vs Mount Dandenong
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.9 km apart · Montrose profile · Mount Dandenong profile
Montrose Mount Dandenong
Montrose (Vic.) and Mount Dandenong are neighbouring areas with distinct profiles. Mount Dandenong has a more highly qualified population, with 33.3% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 21.2% in Montrose (Vic.). Local amenities also differ sharply; Montrose (Vic.) is much better for walking to health services (58.5% of homes) and groceries (73.6%), while Mount Dandenong has far more public transport stops and departures per 1,000 people.
Daily life is similar in both places, as they share nearly identical typical household incomes and a similar share of people using another language at home. However, the gap in education levels is widening, with Mount Dandenong seeing far more residents complete Year 12. Both areas are now older than the national figure, though residents in Mount Dandenong are noticeably older than those in Montrose (Vic.).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,732
- First area, 2016: 6,761
- First area, 2021: 6,900
- Second area, 2011: 1,237
- Second area, 2016: 1,251
- Second area, 2021: 1,271
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Montrose: 1.0% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Mount Dandenong: 1.1% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Montrose: 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Mount Dandenong: 0.5% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Montrose: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Mount Dandenong: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Montrose: 2.2% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Mount Dandenong: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Montrose: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Mount Dandenong: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Montrose: 3.0% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Mount Dandenong: 2.6% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Montrose: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Mount Dandenong: 3.4% males, 4.7% females
- 50–54 in Montrose: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Mount Dandenong: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Montrose: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Mount Dandenong: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Montrose: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Mount Dandenong: 3.8% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Montrose: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Mount Dandenong: 3.6% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Montrose: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Mount Dandenong: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Montrose: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Mount Dandenong: 1.2% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Montrose: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Mount Dandenong: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Montrose: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Dandenong: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Montrose: 3.6% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Mount Dandenong: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Montrose: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Mount Dandenong: 2.7% males, 4.2% females
- 0–4 in Montrose: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 0–4 in Mount Dandenong: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $613
- First area, 2016: $689
- First area, 2021: $855
- Second area, 2011: $577
- Second area, 2016: $687
- Second area, 2021: $858
- First area, 2011: $1,389
- First area, 2016: $1,707
- First area, 2021: $2,088
- Second area, 2011: $1,353
- Second area, 2016: $1,603
- Second area, 2021: $2,055
- First area, 2011: $1,642
- First area, 2016: $1,956
- First area, 2021: $2,381
- Second area, 2011: $1,729
- Second area, 2016: $1,923
- Second area, 2021: $2,369
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $335
- First area, 2021: $365
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $355
- Second area, 2021: $415
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,761
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,700
- Second area, 2016: $1,989
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Montrose with nearby areas
Compare Mount Dandenong with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Montrose vs Mount Dandenong [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL21736/montrose/vs/SAL21787/mount-dandenong