Compare
Jackass Flat vs White Hills
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.2 km apart · Jackass Flat profile · White Hills profile
Jackass Flat White Hills
White Hills (Vic.) and Jackass Flat are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Residents are far older in White Hills (Vic.), where the typical person is 37, while Jackass Flat is far younger at 28. This is reflected in the home types; White Hills (Vic.) has far more people living alone (29.5%) and a higher share of homes owned outright (31.8%). In contrast, Jackass Flat has a much higher proportion of children under 15 (26.9%) and a far higher share of large homes with four bedrooms. White Hills (Vic.) is also more accessible, with a walkability score of 5.2 (somewhat walkable) compared to 2.9 (mostly car-dependent) in Jackass Flat.
Everyday life shares many similarities across both areas, including nearly identical typical family incomes and similar rates of rental properties. Both areas also have about the same number of schools within 3 km and similar proportions of people who have served in the Defence Force. However, the gap in mobility is wide, with White Hills (Vic.) providing far more public transport departures per 1,000 people (1,311) than Jackass Flat (323). This contrast is consistent with the fact that far more homes in White Hills (Vic.) are within a 15-minute walk of health services.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 301
- First area, 2016: 1,141
- First area, 2021: 1,907
- Second area, 2011: 3,275
- Second area, 2016: 3,219
- Second area, 2021: 3,620
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 26 yrs
- First area, 2021: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Jackass Flat: 0.5% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in White Hills: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Jackass Flat: 0.4% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in White Hills: 1.0% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Jackass Flat: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in White Hills: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Jackass Flat: 1.0% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in White Hills: 2.0% males, 2.6% females
- 65–69 in Jackass Flat: 1.7% males, 1.5% females; 65–69 in White Hills: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Jackass Flat: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 60–64 in White Hills: 2.9% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Jackass Flat: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 55–59 in White Hills: 2.7% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Jackass Flat: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 50–54 in White Hills: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Jackass Flat: 1.6% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in White Hills: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 40–44 in Jackass Flat: 2.0% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in White Hills: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Jackass Flat: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in White Hills: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Jackass Flat: 5.6% males, 6.2% females; 30–34 in White Hills: 3.7% males, 4.4% females
- 25–29 in Jackass Flat: 6.5% males, 6.9% females; 25–29 in White Hills: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 20–24 in Jackass Flat: 3.8% males, 4.7% females; 20–24 in White Hills: 3.5% males, 4.0% females
- 15–19 in Jackass Flat: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in White Hills: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Jackass Flat: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in White Hills: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Jackass Flat: 3.9% males, 4.9% females; 5–9 in White Hills: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Jackass Flat: 5.8% males, 5.9% females; 0–4 in White Hills: 3.2% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $517
- First area, 2016: $688
- First area, 2021: $869
- Second area, 2011: $514
- Second area, 2016: $573
- Second area, 2021: $750
- First area, 2011: $990
- First area, 2016: $1,297
- First area, 2021: $1,805
- Second area, 2011: $1,036
- Second area, 2016: $1,105
- Second area, 2021: $1,395
- First area, 2011: $1,145
- First area, 2016: $1,357
- First area, 2021: $1,911
- Second area, 2011: $1,276
- Second area, 2016: $1,357
- Second area, 2021: $1,773
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $190
- First area, 2016: $310
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,408
- First area, 2016: $1,556
- First area, 2021: $1,515
- Second area, 2011: $1,452
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Jackass Flat with nearby areas
Compare White Hills with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Jackass Flat vs White Hills [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL21250/jackass-flat/vs/SAL22769/white-hills