Compare
Costerfield vs Mount Camel
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.6 km apart · Costerfield profile · Mount Camel profile
Costerfield Mount Camel
Mount Camel and Costerfield are both sparsely populated areas in Victoria. They differ most in their typical incomes and age profiles; the typical weekly household income in Mount Camel is $1,483, which is far higher than the $849 seen in Costerfield. Costerfield is also older, with 37.1% of people aged 65 and over compared to 23.5% in Mount Camel. This older population in Costerfield is consistent with a higher share of people living alone (43.6%) and a higher rate of long-term health conditions (48.6%).
Everyday life is very similar in both places, as they both consist entirely of separate houses and have no public transport stops or commuters. Both areas have an equal share of homes with three or more bedrooms and a similar percentage of people using another language at home. While Costerfield has seen more people move in over the last five years, both areas remain far older than the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 75
- First area, 2021: 70
- Second area, 2011: 286
- Second area, 2016: 106
- Second area, 2021: 136
- First area, 2016: 55 yrs
- First area, 2021: 59 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 56 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Camel: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Camel: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 4.5% females; 75–79 in Mount Camel: 0.0% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Costerfield: 10.6% males, 7.6% females; 70–74 in Mount Camel: 5.6% males, 4.0% females
- 65–69 in Costerfield: 12.1% males, 7.6% females; 65–69 in Mount Camel: 5.6% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Costerfield: 4.5% males, 7.6% females; 60–64 in Mount Camel: 8.7% males, 10.3% females
- 55–59 in Costerfield: 7.6% males, 6.1% females; 55–59 in Mount Camel: 2.4% males, 11.1% females
- 50–54 in Costerfield: 6.1% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Mount Camel: 7.9% males, 6.3% females
- 45–49 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Mount Camel: 2.4% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Mount Camel: 0.0% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Costerfield: 6.1% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Camel: 2.4% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Costerfield: 4.5% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Mount Camel: 4.0% males, 2.4% females
- 25–29 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Camel: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Camel: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Camel: 4.0% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 6.1% females; 10–14 in Mount Camel: 3.2% males, 5.6% females
- 5–9 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Mount Camel: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Costerfield: 0.0% males, 4.5% females; 0–4 in Mount Camel: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $543
- First area, 2021: $492
- Second area, 2011: $417
- Second area, 2016: $550
- Second area, 2021: $655
- First area, 2016: $687
- First area, 2021: $849
- Second area, 2011: $806
- Second area, 2016: $1,541
- Second area, 2021: $1,483
- First area, 2016: $1,437
- First area, 2021: $1,312
- Second area, 2011: $877
- Second area, 2016: $1,781
- Second area, 2021: $1,562
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 1.8
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $50
- Second area, 2011: $100
- Second area, 2021: $125
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,050
- Second area, 2011: $1,200
- Second area, 2016: $1,167
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Costerfield with nearby areas
Compare Mount Camel with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Costerfield vs Mount Camel [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20652/costerfield/vs/SAL21781/mount-camel