Compare
Chum Creek vs Healesville
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.4 km apart · Chum Creek profile · Healesville profile
Chum Creek Healesville
Healesville and Chum Creek are neighbouring areas in the Yarra Ranges, but they offer very different lifestyles. Healesville is a more connected hub, rated as somewhat walkable, where 65% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries. In contrast, Chum Creek is car-dependent, with only 0.2% of homes near groceries and no residents within a 15-minute walk of health services. There are also notable financial and housing gaps: the typical weekly household income is well higher in Chum Creek ($1,902) than in Healesville ($1,472), and Chum Creek has a far higher share of separate houses at 100%.
Both areas are very similar in their makeup, with an equal 3.2% share of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. They also share a similar proportion of adults with a bachelor degree or higher, at around 19%. While Healesville has far more public transport stops and departures, Chum Creek has a far higher number of schools per 1,000 children. The gap in home ownership is also distinct, with renting being far more common in Healesville at 17.3%, compared to just 6.5% in Chum Creek.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 932
- First area, 2016: 983
- First area, 2021: 981
- Second area, 2011: 6,839
- Second area, 2016: 7,461
- Second area, 2021: 7,589
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chum Creek: 0.7% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Healesville: 1.4% males, 2.1% females
- 80–84 in Chum Creek: 1.0% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Healesville: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Chum Creek: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Healesville: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 70–74 in Chum Creek: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Healesville: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Chum Creek: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 65–69 in Healesville: 2.9% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Chum Creek: 3.8% males, 5.6% females; 60–64 in Healesville: 3.2% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Chum Creek: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Healesville: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Chum Creek: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Healesville: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Chum Creek: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Healesville: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Chum Creek: 3.9% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Healesville: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Chum Creek: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Healesville: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Chum Creek: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Healesville: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Chum Creek: 2.7% males, 2.1% females; 25–29 in Healesville: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Chum Creek: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Healesville: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Chum Creek: 3.1% males, 1.8% females; 15–19 in Healesville: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Chum Creek: 2.9% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Healesville: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Chum Creek: 3.6% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in Healesville: 3.0% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Chum Creek: 2.4% males, 1.3% females; 0–4 in Healesville: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $528
- First area, 2016: $633
- First area, 2021: $751
- Second area, 2011: $500
- Second area, 2016: $584
- Second area, 2021: $707
- First area, 2011: $1,285
- First area, 2016: $1,483
- First area, 2021: $1,902
- Second area, 2011: $982
- Second area, 2016: $1,190
- Second area, 2021: $1,472
- First area, 2011: $1,375
- First area, 2016: $1,756
- First area, 2021: $2,066
- Second area, 2011: $1,239
- Second area, 2016: $1,494
- Second area, 2021: $1,911
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $270
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $361
- Second area, 2011: $219
- Second area, 2016: $301
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $1,473
- First area, 2016: $1,591
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,570
- Second area, 2016: $1,576
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Chum Creek with nearby areas
Compare Healesville with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chum Creek vs Healesville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20560/chum-creek/vs/SAL21158/healesville