Compare
The Ridgeway vs Oaks Estate
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.2 km apart · The Ridgeway profile · Oaks Estate profile
The Ridgeway Oaks Estate
Oaks Estate and The Ridgeway are neighbouring areas with very different characters. Oaks Estate is more diverse and mobile, with 31.9% of residents arriving recently from overseas and 21.6% using a language other than English at home. The Ridgeway is an older and wealthier area; its typical resident is 52, compared to 40 in Oaks Estate, and the typical weekly household income is far higher at $2,791, while Oaks Estate's is $1,542. Housing also differs sharply, as all homes in The Ridgeway are separate houses, whereas 44% of dwellings in Oaks Estate are flats or apartments.
Both areas share similar rates of long-term health conditions and a similar proportion of people who provide unpaid care for children. However, the gap between them in other areas is wide. Oaks Estate is very walkable and well-connected to public transport, while The Ridgeway is car-dependent. This contrast is reflected in home ownership and transport; 45.4% of Oaks Estate households rent, and 14.5% have no motor vehicle, while 41.8% of homes in The Ridgeway are owned outright.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 167
- First area, 2016: 163
- First area, 2021: 162
- Second area, 2011: 259
- Second area, 2016: 251
- Second area, 2021: 375
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in The Ridgeway: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Oaks Estate: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in The Ridgeway: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Oaks Estate: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in The Ridgeway: 8.5% males, 6.1% females; 75–79 in Oaks Estate: 1.1% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in The Ridgeway: 3.6% males, 6.1% females; 70–74 in Oaks Estate: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in The Ridgeway: 0.0% males, 4.8% females; 65–69 in Oaks Estate: 2.2% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in The Ridgeway: 4.2% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Oaks Estate: 5.5% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in The Ridgeway: 4.8% males, 4.2% females; 55–59 in Oaks Estate: 4.1% males, 1.4% females
- 50–54 in The Ridgeway: 3.6% males, 8.5% females; 50–54 in Oaks Estate: 5.5% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in The Ridgeway: 4.2% males, 1.8% females; 45–49 in Oaks Estate: 5.5% males, 1.7% females
- 40–44 in The Ridgeway: 1.8% males, 2.4% females; 40–44 in Oaks Estate: 7.7% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in The Ridgeway: 3.0% males, 6.1% females; 35–39 in Oaks Estate: 6.1% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in The Ridgeway: 3.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Oaks Estate: 8.8% males, 6.9% females
- 25–29 in The Ridgeway: 4.8% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Oaks Estate: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in The Ridgeway: 1.8% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Oaks Estate: 3.3% males, 1.1% females
- 15–19 in The Ridgeway: 1.8% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Oaks Estate: 1.4% males, 0.8% females
- 10–14 in The Ridgeway: 0.0% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Oaks Estate: 1.4% males, 1.9% females
- 5–9 in The Ridgeway: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Oaks Estate: 1.7% males, 2.5% females
- 0–4 in The Ridgeway: 1.8% males, 1.8% females; 0–4 in Oaks Estate: 3.6% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $882
- First area, 2016: $1,100
- First area, 2021: $1,170
- Second area, 2011: $715
- Second area, 2016: $638
- Second area, 2021: $946
- First area, 2011: $2,833
- First area, 2016: $2,812
- First area, 2021: $2,791
- Second area, 2011: $778
- Second area, 2016: $860
- Second area, 2021: $1,542
- First area, 2011: $2,035
- First area, 2016: $3,250
- First area, 2021: $2,805
- Second area, 2011: $2,071
- Second area, 2016: $2,428
- Second area, 2021: $2,166
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 1.7
- Second area, 2016: 1.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $125
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $625
- Second area, 2011: $116
- Second area, 2016: $165
- Second area, 2021: $220
- First area, 2011: $2,100
- First area, 2016: $2,500
- First area, 2021: $2,245
- Second area, 2011: $1,600
- Second area, 2016: $1,875
- Second area, 2021: $1,575
- First area, 2011: 1.30
- First area, 2016: 0.60
- First area, 2021: 0.60
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare The Ridgeway with nearby areas
Compare Oaks Estate with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). The Ridgeway vs Oaks Estate [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL13852/the-ridgeway/vs/SAL80104/oaks-estate