Compare
Ropes Crossing vs Shanes Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.1 km apart · Ropes Crossing profile · Shanes Park profile
Ropes Crossing Shanes Park
Ropes Crossing and Shanes Park are neighbouring areas with very different characters. Ropes Crossing is a populous hub where the typical resident is just 31, and 30.7% of people are children under 15. This is a well-qualified and mobile area, with 29.9% of adults holding a bachelor degree and 43.4% of people moving in during the last five years. It is also somewhat walkable, with 98.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school. In contrast, Shanes Park is sparsely populated and car-dependent. Residents there are far older, with a typical age of 39, and 46.5% of homes are owned outright.
These two areas have tracked very differently since 2011, and the gap in their walkability and accessibility is widening. While Ropes Crossing has grown into a walkable centre with nearby shops and parks, Shanes Park remains dominated by separate houses and has no homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries or schools. Despite this, they share similar levels of unemployment and have roughly the same number of schools within 3 km.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,479
- First area, 2016: 6,171
- First area, 2021: 7,280
- Second area, 2011: 400
- Second area, 2016: 407
- Second area, 2021: 384
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ropes Crossing: 0.3% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Shanes Park: 0.8% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Ropes Crossing: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Shanes Park: 0.0% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Ropes Crossing: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Shanes Park: 2.4% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Ropes Crossing: 0.5% males, 1.2% females; 70–74 in Shanes Park: 1.6% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Ropes Crossing: 0.7% males, 1.0% females; 65–69 in Shanes Park: 3.2% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Ropes Crossing: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 60–64 in Shanes Park: 2.6% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Ropes Crossing: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 55–59 in Shanes Park: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Ropes Crossing: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 50–54 in Shanes Park: 6.6% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Ropes Crossing: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 45–49 in Shanes Park: 2.6% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Ropes Crossing: 4.7% males, 4.4% females; 40–44 in Shanes Park: 3.2% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Ropes Crossing: 5.6% males, 7.0% females; 35–39 in Shanes Park: 4.8% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Ropes Crossing: 4.0% males, 4.9% females; 30–34 in Shanes Park: 2.1% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Ropes Crossing: 2.9% males, 3.5% females; 25–29 in Shanes Park: 2.9% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Ropes Crossing: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Shanes Park: 5.8% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in Ropes Crossing: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Shanes Park: 0.8% males, 5.6% females
- 10–14 in Ropes Crossing: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Shanes Park: 4.8% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Ropes Crossing: 5.7% males, 6.1% females; 5–9 in Shanes Park: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Ropes Crossing: 5.5% males, 4.9% females; 0–4 in Shanes Park: 2.9% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $852
- First area, 2016: $852
- First area, 2021: $958
- Second area, 2011: $462
- Second area, 2016: $628
- Second area, 2021: $752
- First area, 2011: $1,883
- First area, 2016: $2,028
- First area, 2021: $2,216
- Second area, 2011: $915
- Second area, 2016: $1,708
- Second area, 2021: $1,531
- First area, 2011: $1,958
- First area, 2016: $2,055
- First area, 2021: $2,317
- Second area, 2011: $1,125
- Second area, 2016: $1,524
- Second area, 2021: $1,968
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 3.2
- First area, 2021: 3.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $450
- First area, 2016: $480
- First area, 2021: $480
- Second area, 2011: $310
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $440
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,383
- First area, 2021: $2,300
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $1,909
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Ropes Crossing with nearby areas
Compare Shanes Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ropes Crossing vs Shanes Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL13411/ropes-crossing/vs/SAL13539/shanes-park