Compare
Robertson vs Wildes Meadow
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.0 km apart · Robertson profile · Wildes Meadow profile
Robertson Wildes Meadow
Robertson (NSW) and Wildes Meadow are neighbouring areas in New South Wales with very different layouts. Robertson (NSW) is more walkable, with a score of 3.3 (mostly car-dependent), while Wildes Meadow is 0.3 (car-dependent). This is reflected in local access; for example, 54.0% of Robertson (NSW) homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, compared to just 3.2% in Wildes Meadow. Robertson (NSW) also has a younger population, with 18.3% of people under 15, which is well higher than the 12.4% seen in Wildes Meadow.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining rural centres where the typical weekly rent is nearly identical at around $443 to $450. They share a similar housing density, with about 2.4 to 2.5 people per home. While Wildes Meadow has a far higher share of university degrees at 35.1% and more people working from home (43.1%), both areas sit well above the national figure for typical weekly incomes.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,849
- First area, 2016: 1,865
- First area, 2021: 2,017
- Second area, 2011: 515
- Second area, 2016: 259
- Second area, 2021: 249
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 55 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 57 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Robertson: 1.2% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Wildes Meadow: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Robertson: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Wildes Meadow: 1.2% males, 2.9% females
- 75–79 in Robertson: 2.1% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Wildes Meadow: 6.1% males, 2.9% females
- 70–74 in Robertson: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Wildes Meadow: 4.5% males, 4.5% females
- 65–69 in Robertson: 3.5% males, 4.4% females; 65–69 in Wildes Meadow: 5.7% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Robertson: 4.2% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Wildes Meadow: 6.9% males, 6.1% females
- 55–59 in Robertson: 3.8% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Wildes Meadow: 2.9% males, 6.1% females
- 50–54 in Robertson: 3.8% males, 4.4% females; 50–54 in Wildes Meadow: 2.9% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Robertson: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Wildes Meadow: 4.1% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Robertson: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Wildes Meadow: 0.0% males, 1.2% females
- 35–39 in Robertson: 1.8% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Wildes Meadow: 0.0% males, 1.6% females
- 30–34 in Robertson: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Wildes Meadow: 1.6% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in Robertson: 1.6% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Wildes Meadow: 1.2% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Robertson: 2.0% males, 1.3% females; 20–24 in Wildes Meadow: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 15–19 in Robertson: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Wildes Meadow: 2.4% males, 3.7% females
- 10–14 in Robertson: 3.7% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Wildes Meadow: 5.3% males, 1.6% females
- 5–9 in Robertson: 3.5% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Wildes Meadow: 2.9% males, 2.4% females
- 0–4 in Robertson: 3.1% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Wildes Meadow: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $567
- First area, 2016: $664
- First area, 2021: $806
- Second area, 2011: $705
- Second area, 2016: $1,004
- Second area, 2021: $846
- First area, 2011: $1,150
- First area, 2016: $1,422
- First area, 2021: $1,736
- Second area, 2011: $1,526
- Second area, 2016: $1,946
- Second area, 2021: $2,100
- First area, 2011: $1,316
- First area, 2016: $1,610
- First area, 2021: $2,135
- Second area, 2011: $1,675
- Second area, 2016: $2,250
- Second area, 2021: $2,615
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $218
- First area, 2016: $350
- First area, 2021: $443
- Second area, 2011: $231
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $450
- First area, 2011: $1,820
- First area, 2016: $1,794
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $3,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,194
- Second area, 2021: $2,383
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Robertson with nearby areas
Compare Wildes Meadow with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Robertson vs Wildes Meadow [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL13389/robertson/vs/SAL14309/wildes-meadow