Compare
Polo Flat vs Rose Valley
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 16 km apart · Polo Flat profile · Rose Valley profile
Polo Flat Rose Valley
Rose Valley (Snowy Monaro Regional - NSW) and Polo Flat are both sparsely populated areas in New South Wales. Polo Flat has a much higher typical family income of $3,750 per week compared to $2,250 in Rose Valley (Snowy Monaro Regional - NSW). However, rent is far higher in Rose Valley (Snowy Monaro Regional - NSW) at $310 a week, while Polo Flat is $180. Polo Flat is also more accessible, with six schools within 3 km and a walkability score described as mostly car-dependent, whereas Rose Valley (Snowy Monaro Regional - NSW) is car-dependent.
Both areas share a very similar typical weekly household income of around $1,875. They are also alike in that no homes in either place are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, health services, or schools. While Rose Valley (Snowy Monaro Regional - NSW) has a slightly older typical resident at 44, it also has a higher number of people per bedroom at 1.0 compared to 0.7 in Polo Flat.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 12
- First area, 2016: 24
- First area, 2021: 13
- Second area, 2016: 33
- Second area, 2021: 32
- First area, 2011: 22 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Polo Flat: 45.5% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 10.7% females
- 60–64 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 27.3% females; 60–64 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Rose Valley: 14.3% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 17.9% females
- 40–44 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 14.3% females
- 35–39 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 27.3% females; 20–24 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 17.9% females
- 5–9 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Rose Valley: 10.7% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Polo Flat: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 14.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $579
- First area, 2016: $589
- First area, 2021: $866
- Second area, 2016: $524
- Second area, 2021: $774
- First area, 2011: $620
- First area, 2016: $1,187
- First area, 2021: $1,875
- Second area, 2016: $900
- Second area, 2021: $1,874
- First area, 2016: $1,187
- First area, 2021: $3,750
- Second area, 2016: $1,124
- Second area, 2021: $2,250
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 1.9
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $753
- First area, 2016: $154
- First area, 2021: $180
- Second area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $1,625
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2016: 1.20
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Polo Flat with nearby areas
Compare Rose Valley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Polo Flat vs Rose Valley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL13250/polo-flat/vs/SAL13414/rose-valley