Compare
Perisher Valley vs Smiggin Holes
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.8 km apart · Perisher Valley profile · Smiggin Holes profile
Perisher Valley Smiggin Holes
Perisher Valley and Smiggin Holes are both sparsely populated areas. Perisher Valley has a much better layout for pedestrians, with a walkability score of 3.2 (mostly car-dependent) compared to Smiggin Holes at 1.3 (car-dependent). This is seen in the local amenities; 72.9% of Perisher Valley homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while 0.0% of homes in Smiggin Holes have the same access. Residents in Perisher Valley are also noticeably older, with a typical age of 31 compared to 27 in Smiggin Holes.
Both areas are very similar in their steep terrain and typical weekly personal incomes, which are $936 in Perisher Valley and $900 in Smiggin Holes. Neither area has any homes within a 15-minute walk of a school or health service. While Perisher Valley has better access to parks and shops, Smiggin Holes has a far higher number of street intersections per square kilometre.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Perisher Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Perisher Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Perisher Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Perisher Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Perisher Valley: 3.3% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Perisher Valley: 6.5% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Perisher Valley: 0.0% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Perisher Valley: 9.8% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Perisher Valley: 6.5% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Perisher Valley: 0.0% males, 4.3% females; 40–44 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Perisher Valley: 4.3% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Perisher Valley: 4.3% males, 10.9% females; 30–34 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Perisher Valley: 9.8% males, 16.3% females; 25–29 in Smiggin Holes: 20.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Perisher Valley: 7.6% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Smiggin Holes: 46.7% males, 33.3% females
- 15–19 in Perisher Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Perisher Valley: 5.4% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Perisher Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Perisher Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Smiggin Holes: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Perisher Valley with nearby areas
Compare Smiggin Holes with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Perisher Valley vs Smiggin Holes [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL13199/perisher-valley/vs/SAL13574/smiggin-holes