Compare
Lower Acacia Creek vs Undercliffe
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Lower Acacia Creek profile · Undercliffe profile
Lower Acacia Creek Undercliffe
Lower Acacia Creek and Undercliffe are both sparsely populated areas in New South Wales. They differ sharply in their family and social makeup; Undercliffe has a far higher share of children (18.5% compared to 0.0%) and seniors, while Lower Acacia Creek has a higher proportion of First Nations residents (8.3%). Income is also quite different, with the typical weekly personal income far higher in Lower Acacia Creek at $693, compared to $366 in Undercliffe.
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, such as having the same typical resident age of 59 and no residents born overseas. Both areas are entirely car-dependent, with no public transport or walkable amenities. While they share these traits, other gaps remain wide: the share of people with no religion is far higher in Undercliffe at 66.7%, and a far higher proportion of people in Undercliffe have volunteered (32.1% compared to 11.4%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 38
- First area, 2021: 36
- Second area, 2016: 12
- Second area, 2021: 27
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 59 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 59 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Lower Acacia Creek: 13.8% males, 10.3% females; 75–79 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Undercliffe: 29.4% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Lower Acacia Creek: 10.3% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Undercliffe: 23.5% males, 17.6% females
- 60–64 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 20.7% females; 60–64 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 17.2% females; 55–59 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Lower Acacia Creek: 27.6% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Undercliffe: 29.4% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Lower Acacia Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Undercliffe: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $515
- First area, 2021: $693
- Second area, 2016: $262
- Second area, 2021: $366
- First area, 2016: $900
- First area, 2021: $1,312
- Second area, 2016: $537
- Second area, 2021: $833
- First area, 2016: $900
- First area, 2021: $1,624
- Second area, 2016: $537
- Second area, 2021: $850
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 1.8
- First area, 2021: 1.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $1,400
- First area, 2021: $747
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2016: 0.50
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Lower Acacia Creek with nearby areas
Compare Undercliffe with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lower Acacia Creek vs Undercliffe [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL12408/lower-acacia-creek/vs/SAL14028/undercliffe