Compare
Ilford vs Running Stream
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Ilford profile · Running Stream profile
Ilford Running Stream
Ilford and Running Stream are both sparsely populated rural areas in New South Wales. Ilford has a younger feel, with 18.2% of people being children under 15, compared to just 5.0% in Running Stream. Residents in Running Stream are far older, with a typical age of 61 and half the population aged 65 or over. This older demographic in Running Stream is consistent with a higher share of long-term health conditions (50.0%) and more people working from home (34.0%).
These two neighbours are almost identical in their typical weekly household incomes, which sit around $933 to $959. Both areas are entirely made up of separate houses and have the same number of public transport routes. While they share these basics, Ilford has a higher rate of full-time employment at 67.7%, whereas Running Stream has a much lower unemployment rate at 0.0%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 306
- First area, 2016: 187
- First area, 2021: 165
- Second area, 2016: 134
- Second area, 2021: 120
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 61 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ilford: 2.1% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Running Stream: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Ilford: 0.0% males, 3.5% females; 80–84 in Running Stream: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Ilford: 6.4% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Running Stream: 8.9% males, 4.8% females
- 70–74 in Ilford: 9.9% males, 4.3% females; 70–74 in Running Stream: 7.3% males, 4.0% females
- 65–69 in Ilford: 5.0% males, 5.7% females; 65–69 in Running Stream: 5.6% males, 7.3% females
- 60–64 in Ilford: 4.3% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Running Stream: 11.3% males, 6.5% females
- 55–59 in Ilford: 5.0% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Running Stream: 0.0% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Ilford: 5.0% males, 7.8% females; 50–54 in Running Stream: 3.2% males, 2.4% females
- 45–49 in Ilford: 2.1% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Running Stream: 5.6% males, 4.8% females
- 40–44 in Ilford: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Running Stream: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Ilford: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Running Stream: 2.4% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Ilford: 0.0% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Running Stream: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Ilford: 2.1% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Running Stream: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Ilford: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Running Stream: 3.2% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Ilford: 3.5% males, 6.4% females; 15–19 in Running Stream: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 10–14 in Ilford: 4.3% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Running Stream: 3.2% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Ilford: 2.1% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Running Stream: 2.4% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Ilford: 0.0% males, 5.0% females; 0–4 in Running Stream: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $480
- First area, 2016: $504
- First area, 2021: $537
- Second area, 2016: $566
- Second area, 2021: $575
- First area, 2011: $1,025
- First area, 2016: $924
- First area, 2021: $933
- Second area, 2016: $1,025
- Second area, 2021: $959
- First area, 2011: $1,109
- First area, 2016: $1,142
- First area, 2021: $1,375
- Second area, 2016: $1,093
- Second area, 2021: $1,292
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 1.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $220
- First area, 2016: $180
- First area, 2021: $265
- Second area, 2016: $175
- Second area, 2021: $215
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $855
- First area, 2021: $1,062
- Second area, 2016: $1,096
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Ilford with nearby areas
Compare Running Stream with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ilford vs Running Stream [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11979/ilford/vs/SAL13456/running-stream