Compare
Fosters Valley vs Tannas Mount
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.9 km apart · Fosters Valley profile · Tannas Mount profile
Fosters Valley Tannas Mount
Fosters Valley and Tannas Mount are both sparsely populated areas in New South Wales. Fosters Valley has a much older population, with 26.4% aged 65 and over and a typical resident aged 49. This is consistent with the area having a far higher share of people needing help with daily activities (11.1%) and those with long-term health conditions (34.7%). In contrast, Tannas Mount is younger, with 27.7% children under 15. It also has a far higher share of people working full-time (60.9%) and those in de facto relationships (20.0%).
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, as they have the same typical weekly personal income of around $700 and identical household sizes of 2.7 people. Neither area has any public transport stops or an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. While Fosters Valley has a far higher share of people who identify with no religion (40.3%), both areas are similarly far below the national figure for people born overseas.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 188
- First area, 2016: 82
- First area, 2021: 72
- Second area, 2016: 43
- Second area, 2021: 47
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Tannas Mount: 9.6% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Fosters Valley: 7.1% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 7.7% females
- 65–69 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 9.5% females; 65–69 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Fosters Valley: 9.5% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Tannas Mount: 7.7% males, 5.8% females
- 50–54 in Fosters Valley: 7.1% males, 7.1% females; 50–54 in Tannas Mount: 9.6% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Fosters Valley: 7.1% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Tannas Mount: 5.8% males, 5.8% females
- 40–44 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 11.9% females; 40–44 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 9.6% females
- 25–29 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 9.5% females; 25–29 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Tannas Mount: 5.8% males, 5.8% females
- 15–19 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 11.9% females; 10–14 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 7.7% females
- 5–9 in Fosters Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Tannas Mount: 0.0% males, 5.8% females
- 0–4 in Fosters Valley: 11.9% males, 7.1% females; 0–4 in Tannas Mount: 7.7% males, 5.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $607
- First area, 2016: $661
- First area, 2021: $706
- Second area, 2016: $817
- Second area, 2021: $695
- First area, 2011: $1,284
- First area, 2016: $1,437
- First area, 2021: $2,062
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,833
- First area, 2011: $1,446
- First area, 2016: $1,583
- First area, 2021: $2,187
- Second area, 2016: $1,916
- Second area, 2021: $2,125
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $100
- Second area, 2016: $165
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,456
- First area, 2016: $1,183
- First area, 2021: $1,885
- Second area, 2021: $2,454
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.40
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Fosters Valley with nearby areas
Compare Tannas Mount with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fosters Valley vs Tannas Mount [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11555/fosters-valley/vs/SAL13766/tannas-mount