Compare
Ellis Lane vs Kirkham
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.2 km apart · Ellis Lane profile · Kirkham profile
Ellis Lane Kirkham
Ellis Lane and Kirkham are neighbouring areas in Camden with distinct profiles. Kirkham is wealthier, with a typical household income of $3,416 per week compared to $2,269 in Ellis Lane. Kirkham also has a more qualified workforce, with 57.8% of residents completing Year 12, which is far higher than the 47.5% in Ellis Lane. In contrast, Ellis Lane has a higher typical weekly rent of $428, while Kirkham's is much lower at $245. Ellis Lane also has a higher proportion of children under 15 (20.2%) and people aged 65 and over (20.3%) than Kirkham.
Both areas are virtually identical in their housing and demographics, as every single home in both places is a separate detached house. They also share very similar proportions of people born overseas and First Nations residents. While they are alike in these respects, the gap in typical incomes has remained wide, and Kirkham continues to have a much higher share of households earning $3,000 or more per week than Ellis Lane.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 808
- First area, 2016: 857
- First area, 2021: 852
- Second area, 2011: 694
- Second area, 2016: 699
- Second area, 2021: 690
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ellis Lane: 0.5% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Kirkham: 0.4% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Ellis Lane: 1.2% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Kirkham: 1.6% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Ellis Lane: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Kirkham: 2.0% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Ellis Lane: 3.8% males, 2.9% females; 70–74 in Kirkham: 2.3% males, 1.3% females
- 65–69 in Ellis Lane: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Kirkham: 3.3% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Ellis Lane: 4.0% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Kirkham: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Ellis Lane: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Kirkham: 4.3% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Ellis Lane: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Kirkham: 5.3% males, 5.8% females
- 45–49 in Ellis Lane: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Kirkham: 3.7% males, 4.6% females
- 40–44 in Ellis Lane: 2.7% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Kirkham: 1.0% males, 2.2% females
- 35–39 in Ellis Lane: 1.9% males, 2.1% females; 35–39 in Kirkham: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
- 30–34 in Ellis Lane: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 30–34 in Kirkham: 2.0% males, 1.3% females
- 25–29 in Ellis Lane: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Kirkham: 2.6% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Ellis Lane: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Kirkham: 4.6% males, 4.7% females
- 15–19 in Ellis Lane: 4.5% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Kirkham: 5.5% males, 6.6% females
- 10–14 in Ellis Lane: 4.9% males, 4.5% females; 10–14 in Kirkham: 4.5% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Ellis Lane: 3.9% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Kirkham: 3.0% males, 2.0% females
- 0–4 in Ellis Lane: 2.9% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Kirkham: 1.6% males, 1.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $708
- First area, 2016: $842
- First area, 2021: $875
- Second area, 2011: $841
- Second area, 2016: $928
- Second area, 2021: $1,009
- First area, 2011: $1,916
- First area, 2016: $2,356
- First area, 2021: $2,269
- Second area, 2011: $2,703
- Second area, 2016: $2,942
- Second area, 2021: $3,416
- First area, 2011: $1,932
- First area, 2016: $2,333
- First area, 2021: $2,472
- Second area, 2011: $2,759
- Second area, 2016: $2,926
- Second area, 2021: $3,349
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.2
- First area, 2021: 3.1
- Second area, 2011: 3.6
- Second area, 2016: 3.6
- Second area, 2021: 3.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $443
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $428
- Second area, 2011: $700
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $245
- First area, 2011: $2,650
- First area, 2016: $2,513
- First area, 2021: $2,370
- Second area, 2011: $3,100
- Second area, 2016: $2,600
- Second area, 2021: $2,800
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Ellis Lane with nearby areas
Compare Kirkham with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ellis Lane vs Kirkham [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11408/ellis-lane/vs/SAL12180/kirkham